It has already altered our political debate, changed the agenda, shifted the discussion in newspapers, on cable TV, and even around the water cooler. And that is wonderful.
Suddenly, the issues of equity, fairness, justice, income
distribution, and accountability for the economic cataclysm–issues all
but ignored for a generation—are front and center. We have moved beyond
the one-dimensional conversation about how much and where to cut the
deficit. Questions more central to the social fabric of our nation have
returned to the heart of the political debate. By forcing this new
discussion, OWS has made most of the other participants in our
politics—who either didn’t want to have this conversation or weren’t
able to make it happen—look pretty small.
. . . But until these protests, no political figure or movement had made Americans pay attention to these facts in a meaningful way. Indeed, over the long hot summer, as poverty rose and unemployment stagnated, the entire discussion was about cutting our deficit.
. . . But until these protests, no political figure or movement had made Americans pay attention to these facts in a meaningful way. Indeed, over the long hot summer, as poverty rose and unemployment stagnated, the entire discussion was about cutting our deficit.
And then OWS showed up. They brought something that had been in short
supply: passion—the necessary ingredient that powers citizen activism.
The tempered, carefully modulated, and finely nuanced statements of
Beltway politicians and policy wonks do not alter the debate.