- Click here for the full response.
There is credible evidence that the Venezuela-focused component of U.S. foreign policy and information operations includes elements that resemble propaganda or narrative-shaping aimed at building public support (or at least acquiescence) for more robust intervention. Whether it amounts to a full-blown campaign explicitly to justify an invasion is less clear and remains contested. Here is a breakdown of what we do know, what is in dispute, and where more scrutiny is needed. . . .
. . .
Why this matters
- Propaganda and narrative framing are important because public support (or lack thereof) heavily influences whether military or covert operations are politically feasible.
- If the U.S. is preparing for escalation, having the narrative groundwork laid helps deter internal dissent or opposition.
- For countries like Venezuela, being aware of these narrative moves means they can attempt counter-narratives or international legal measures.
- From a policy and ethics perspective, if a government uses propaganda to prepare its citizens for war, it raises issues of democratic accountability, transparency, and legality.
Pages
▼