Showing posts sorted by relevance for query public opinion. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query public opinion. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, July 22, 2022

Public Opinion and Ideology

What is public opinion?

- Public opinion is the collective opinion on a specific topic or voting intention relevant to society. It is the people's views on matters affecting them.

- public opinion, an aggregate of the individual views, attitudes, and beliefs about a particular topic, expressed by a significant proportion of a community.

- Public opinion is one of the most frequently evoked terms in American politics. At the most basic level, public opinion represents people’s collective preferences on matters related to government and politics

How do we know what public opinion is?

“Informal” Ways to Measure Public Opinion.

The formal academic study of public opinion is relatively new but the practical study of public opinion is not new at all. Governments have paid attention to public opinion as long as there have been governments. Even the most oppressive tyrants need to know what the people are thinking, even if just to oppress them more effectively. As the famous investigator of public opinion, V.O. Key, Jr. said, “Governments must concern themselves with the opinions of their citizens, if only to provide a basis for repression of disaffection.”

One of the earliest expressions of public opinion was rebellion. Peasant rebellions have occurred throughout history. When the king saw his subjects in open rebellion, it was a pretty clear sign that the public’s support for his government was eroding. Unpaid taxes was another clue; when rulers saw their tax receipts dwindle and heard reports of tax collectors being killed, they knew that public opinion was turning against them.

For centuries rulers have established secret police forces to find out which people oppose the government and to eliminate them. Secret police have, among other things, acted as monitors of public opinion. 

How do we measure public opinion?

Public Opinion Polls

A scientific, nonbiased public opinion poll is a type of survey or inquiry designed to measure the public's views regarding a particular topic or series of topics. Trained interviewers ask questions of people chosen at random from the population being measured. Responses are given, and interpretations are made based on the results. It is important in a random sample that everyone in the population being studied has an equal chance of participating. Otherwise, the results could be biased and, therefore, not representative of the population. Representative samples are chosen in order to make generalizations about a particular population being studied.  

- From the Pew Research Center: A short course - Public Opinion Polling Basics.

- FiveThirtyEight’s Pollster Ratings.

- The Polls Got It Right In 2022. Here Are The Pollsters To Trust.

- How does Gallup polling work?

 

Why does a government or other institution want to understand public opinion.

- What’s public opinion to a democracy?

In a democracy like ours it is an accepted idea that the public which is called upon to make important decisions at the ballot box must be kept informed of popular issues. It is also an important principle of our governmental system that public policies are decided upon by the people. Popular control over lawmaking bodies, over executives in the government, and over domestic and foreign policy is a basic idea in our political society. The people are the source of power. Hence their opinions should mold the action of government.

- What's public opinion in a campaign?

The first thing that any political campaign must do is establish the theme, message and issues. Many candidates "think" they know what the top issues are in their districts but why make costly assumptions if you can just ask them. That may sound simple but is it far more complex than you might think.

The universe of households polled is as important as the questions that you ask. Polling can not only tell your campaign what your voters are thinking about issues and candidates, it can provide you path to change their opinion. The results must be properly analyzed and cross referenced with all available demographic data available to give you results that are the most accurate and meaningful to your political campaign.


Viability Polling

If you care considering running for political office or beginning a ballot initiative campaign you will want to know what to know where you stand. Viability polling can tell you not only whether you should you run and assess your chances for victory, it can also determine whether your opponent has any exploitable flaws and help with initial fundraising and budget projections for the campaign. Viability and vulnerability polling is ideally conducted before you begin the campaign.


How do people form opinions?

- Political Socialization 

Political socialization is the process by which individuals learn and frequently internalize a political lens framing their perceptions of how power is arranged and how the world around them is (and should be) organized; those perceptions, in turn, shape and define individuals' definitions of who they are and how they should behave in the political and economic institutions in which they live." Political socialization also encompasses the way in which people acquire values and opinions that shape their political stance and ideology

- From Federalist 10: 

The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man; and we see them everywhere brought into different degrees of activity, according to the different circumstances of civil society. A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning government, and many other points, as well of speculation as of practice; an attachment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power; or to persons of other descriptions whose fortunes have been interesting to the human passions, have, in turn, divided mankind into parties, inflamed them with mutual animosity, and rendered them much more disposed to vex and oppress each other than to co-operate for their common good. So strong is this propensity of mankind to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distinctions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions and excite their most violent conflicts. But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society. Those who are creditors, and those who are debtors, fall under a like discrimination. A landed interest, a manufacturing interest, a mercantile interest, a moneyed interest, with many lesser interests, grow up of necessity in civilized nations, and divide them into different classes, actuated by different sentiments and views.

- Agents of Socialization: 

Family

Our first political ideas are shaped within the family. Parents seldom "talk politics" with their young children directly, but casual remarks made around the dinner table or while helping with homework can have an impact. Family tradition is particularly a factor in party identification, as indicated by the phrases lifelong Republican and lifelong Democrat. The family may be losing its power as an agent of socialization, however, as institutions take over more of child care and parents perform less of it.

Schools

Children are introduced to elections and voting when they choose class officers, and the more sophisticated elections in high school and college teach the rudiments of campaigning. Political facts are learned through courses in American history and government, and schools, at their best, encourage students to critically examine government institutions. Schools themselves are involved in politics; issues such as curriculum reform, funding, and government support for private schools often spark a debate that involves students, teachers, parents, and the larger community.

Peer groups

Although peer pressure certainly affects teenagers' lifestyles, it is less evident in developing their political values. Exceptions are issues that directly affect them, such as the Vietnam War during the 1960s. Later, if peers are defined in terms of occupation, then the group does exert an influence on how its members think politically. For example, professionals such as teachers or bankers often have similar political opinions, particularly on matters related to their careers.

Mass media

Much of our political information comes from the mass media: newspapers, magazines, radio, television, and the Internet. The amount of time the average American family watches TV makes it the dominant information source, particularly with the expansion of 24-hour all-news cable channels. Not only does television help shape public opinion by providing news and analysis, but its entertainment programming addresses important contemporary issues that are in the political arena, such as drug use, abortion, and crime. The growth of the Internet is also significant; not only do essentially all-news outlets have their own Web sites, but online bloggers present a broad range of political opinion, information, and analysis.

 

Heuristics - Shortcuts  

Heuristics is the process by which humans use mental short cuts to arrive at decisions. Heuristics are simple strategies that humans, animals, organizations, and even machines use to quickly form judgments, make decisions, and find solutions to complex problems. Often this involves focusing on the most relevant aspects of a problem or situation to formulate a solution. While heuristic processes are used to find the answers and solutions that are most likely to work or be correct, they are not always right or the most accurate. Judgments and decisions based on heuristics are simply good enough to satisfy a pressing need in situations of uncertainty, where information is incomplete. In that sense they can differ from answers given by logic and probability. 
Heuristics and Biases in Political Decision Making.
Heuristics have rapidly become a core concept in the study of political behavior. The term heuristic stems from the ancient Greek heuriskein, which means “to discover.” In psychology and political science, the term is used to describe cognitive shortcuts in decision making under uncertainty. The key idea is that decision makers with limited time, information, or resources use such shortcuts, thereby bypassing a certain amount of information to reach appropriate decisions. In this sense, heuristics contrast with classical rational choice. Using heuristics allows efficient decision making but can lead to biases, errors, and suboptimal decisions. Heuristics allow decision makers to draw inferences, to fill in information gaps, and to form an impression of the decision at hand. Indeed, they may be the only way to come to grips with uncertainty, especially when a decision is urgent.


What is ideology? 

- A political ideology is a coherent set of views on politics and the role of the government. Consistency over a wide range of issues is the hallmark of a political ideology.

- A set of positions on public issues based on an underlying value system such as equality, traditionalism, and individualism.

- Political ideology means any idea or belief, or coordinated body of ideas or beliefs, relating to the purpose, conduct, organization, function or basis of government and related institutions and activities

- A set of beliefs about politics. Individuals use ideologies as an organizing or filtering device for interpreting events, relationships, and policies.


Types of ideologies

Conservatism: A political ideology that embraces individual opportunity, public order, and traditional values. Over the past few decades, more Americans have self-identified as conservative than as liberal, with moderates sometimes surpassing conservatives in number.

Liberalism: A political ideology that embraces equality, civil rights, and individual liberties. Over the past few decades, fewer Americans have self-identified as liberal than as conservative or moderate.

Libertarianism: A political ideology that embraces individual liberty over state (governmental) authority, both in the realm of economic activity and personal or social activity.

Populism: A political ideology that emphasizes government's role as an agent of the common man, the worker, and the farmer, in struggles against concentrated wealth and power. Historically in the United States, "populist" describes any political movement having popular backing which is also perceived to be acting in the interests of ordinary people rather than elites.


How to identify your ideology

Ideological self-identification: An individual's declaration of affinity with a particular political ideology. People self identify with an ideological label based on numerous factors, so such self identification may or may not match up with standard definitions of that ideology.

Political Ideology Tests

- Pew Research Center: Political Typology Quiz.

- Pro Profs: What Political Ideology Am I?

- The World's Smallest Political Quiz.



What do people think about government and democracy?

- Gallup: U.S. Public Opinion and the Role of Government.

- Pew Research Center: Public Trust in Government: 1958-2022.


Can public opinion be manipulated?

Edward Bernays: Manipulating Public Opinion: The Why and The How.

Misinformation is incorrect or misleading information. It differs from disinformation, which is deliberately deceptive. Rumors are information not attributed to any particular source, and so are unreliable and often unverified, but can turn out to be either true or false. Even if later retracted, misinformation can continue to influence actions and memory. People may be more prone to believe misinformation because they are emotionally connected to what they are listening to or are reading.

- The Economist: How political leaders shape public opinion.

Does everyone's opinion really matter?

The Attentive Public

That part of the public that is attuned to current affairs and its media coverage. Much of the American public is disinterested in politics and policy, so opinion leaders and policy makers must direct their ideas to, and seek support from, the smaller attentive public, rather than the broad, general public. 
Voters in Judicial Elections - An Attentive Public or an Uninformed Electorate?

Borrowing from the work of Gabriel Almond, one can argue that the judicial electorate may well be composed of an 'attentive public' whose level of interest and information is sufficient to constitute 'an informed and interested stratum... before whom elite discussion and controversy takes place.' The credibility of such a view of the judicial electorate is assessed in light of sample survey data on registered voters contacted immediately following Oregon's May, 1982 statewide judicial and non-judicial primaries. The evidence suggests that an attentive public conception of the judical electorate may well be an appropriate image to describe elective judicial selection systems.
The Importance of Political Knowledge for Effective Citizenship: Differences Between the Broadcast and Internet Generations.

General political knowledge is a central variable in American politics research. Individuals with high political knowledge exhibit behaviors that are consequential to a well-functioning democracy, including holding more stable political opinions, exhibiting greater ideological constraint, knowing more about political candidates, and being more likely to vote correctly. In this paper, we examine whether the internet revolution, enabling citizens to look up anything at any time, has changed the relative importance of political knowledge in American politics. We show that important generational differences exist between Americans raised during the broadcast era and Americans raised with the presence and accessibility of the internet. Internet access can be a substitute for political knowledge stored in long-term memory, particularly among this younger generation, who may be relying on the internet to store knowledge for them.


Elite Opinion / Opinion Leaders

- How Elites Misread Public Opinion.

- Elite vs. Public Opinion: An Examination of Divergent Views on Immigration.

- Wikipedia: Elite.

- Elite influence on public attitudes about climate policy.




Terminology

public opinion
values
beliefs
liberty
freedom of conscience
equality of opportunity
political ideology
attitude
liberal conservative
libertarian
socialist
political socialization
agents of socialization
- family
- friends
- education
social groups
- race
- ethnicity
- gender
- religion
- party affiliation
elites
political leaders
mass media
marketplace of ideas
stability
change
political knowledge
shortcuts
cues
heuristics
skim and scan
impact on government
- inequity
impact of government
propaganda
measuring public opinion
sample
random sample
sampling error
question wording
social desirability effect
acquiescence bias
selection bias
push poll
bandwagon effect 

Tuesday, June 11, 2024

"The People" - A brief look at the role of public opinion in the American governing system.

Dear ChatGPT: What does "We The People" mean?

ChatGPT: "We the people" is a phrase that starts the preamble to the United States Constitution. It signifies that the authority of the government is derived from the citizens of the country. It's a declaration of the democratic principle that the government exists to serve and represent the collective will and interests of the people. This phrase emphasizes the idea of popular sovereignty, where the ultimate power and authority reside with the people themselves.


Dear ChatGPT: Who does "we the people" refer to?

ChatGPT: "We the people" refers to the collective body of citizens in the United States. It signifies that the authority of the government is derived from the citizens themselves, emphasizing the democratic principle of popular sovereignty. In the context of the preamble to the United States Constitution, "we the people" declares that the Constitution is established by and for the benefit of the citizens of the nation, affirming their role as the ultimate source of political power and legitimacy.


Dear Chat GPT: What is the role of public opinion in the American governing system?

ChatGPT: Public opinion plays a significant role in the American governing system. Here are some key aspects of its role:

Elections: Public opinion shapes election outcomes by influencing voters' choices. Politicians and parties often tailor their platforms and messages to align with prevailing public sentiments to attract support.

Policy-making: Elected officials, particularly in representative democracies like the United States, are expected to consider public opinion when crafting and implementing policies. While they may not always directly follow the majority opinion, they often take it into account to maintain their legitimacy and support.

Accountability: Public opinion serves as a mechanism for holding elected officials accountable for their actions. If officials deviate too far from public preferences, they may face backlash in the form of electoral defeat, protests, or other forms of public opposition.

Checks and balances: Public opinion acts as a check on the power of government institutions. When the public strongly opposes a particular policy or action, it can pressure elected officials, the judiciary, or other branches of government to reconsider or reverse their decisions.

Policy debates: Public opinion shapes the discourse surrounding policy issues. Debates in the media, academia, and among policymakers often reflect and respond to public attitudes and concerns.

Social change: Public opinion can drive social and cultural change by shaping attitudes and norms on issues such as civil rights, environmental protection, and healthcare. Activism and advocacy efforts often aim to mobilize public opinion in support of particular causes.

Overall, public opinion serves as a crucial mechanism for expressing the will of the people and influencing the actions of government in a democratic system like that of the United States.

Sunday, October 16, 2022

Section Eight - The Media and Public Opinion

The Media: various forms of communication channels and platforms that transmit information, news, entertainment, and other content to a large audience. It plays a crucial role in society by informing the public, shaping public opinion, and facilitating public discourse. The media landscape encompasses a wide range of outlets and formats, each serving different purposes and audiences.

Public Opinion: the collective attitudes, beliefs, and sentiments of the general population on various matters of interest or concern. It represents the views held by a significant portion of the public regarding political, social, economic, and cultural issues. Public opinion is important in democratic societies because it influences decision-making processes and policy outcomes.

Information: 

Agents of Socialization:

Schemas: 

Confirmation Bias: 

Social Media: 





Terminology

The Media
- the media
- the press
- access to information
- marketplace of ideas
- sources
- firms
- technologies
- print 
- setting the agenda
- broadcast
- digital
- social media
- freedom of the press
- reporting
- journalists
- bias
- citizen journalism
- reporters
- news leaks
- press releases
- hiring reporters
- consumers
- affluence
- conflict
- informed consumers
- regulations
- content regulations
- print
- broadcast
- prior restraint
- ownership
- loud signal
- public watchdog
- journalism
- policy agenda
- priming
- framing
- mass media
- personal presidency
- radio
- television
- cable
- infotainment
- 24 hour news
- new media
- fake news
- bias
- - political
- - sensational
- - confirmation
- - investigative
- - fairness
- private ownership
- profits
- Watergate scandal
- public ownership
- regulations
- Federal Communications Commission
- agency capture
- fairness doctrine
- consolidation
- Telecommunications Act of 1996
- horserace journalism
- sound bite

Public Opinion
- public opinion
- preferences
- beliefs
- choices
- evaluations
- assessments
- political orientations
- polarization
- origins of opinion
- self-interest
- values
- social groups
- socialization
- political ideology
- liberal
- conservative
- identity politics
- party identification
- race
- gender
- religion
- geography
- outgroups
- political knowledge
- preference stability
- shaping public opinion
- agenda-setting 
- priming
- framing
- measurement
- public opinion polls
- selection bias
- influence
- electoral accountability
- building coalitions
- rulemaking
- legal decisions
- will of the people




Lecture Topics

- Freedom of the Press.
- Sedition.
- Information, Misinformation, Disinformation.
- Social Media.
- Media Bias Chart. 
- freedom of the press.
- the printing press.
- media technology. 
- Army Signal Corp.
- radio and the modern presidency.
- sedition.
- Alien and Sedition Acts.
- propaganda.
- disinformation.
- The business of the media.
- media conglomerate.
- the partisan press.
- media bias.
- The Telecommunications Act of 1996.
- the internet.
- social media as a news source.
- fragmentation.
- political socialization.
- confirmation bias.
- political polarization.
- access journalism.
- Public Opinion
- Free Speech / permissible limits.
- Press Press / permissible limits.
- Sedition
- LII: Sedition.
- First Amendment Encyclopedia: Seditions Libel.
- Dangerous Talk: Scandalous, Seditious, and Treasonable Speech in Pre-Modern England.
- Jamestown.
- The Trial of John Peter Zenger.
- Philadelphia Aurora.
- Benjamin Franklin Bache.
- Alien and Sedition Acts.
- Matthew Lyon.
- Sedition Act of 1918.
- Sedition and the Development of Political Parties.
- Sedition Act of 1798.


Thursday, October 18, 2018

From the Money Cage: The Supreme Court hasn’t followed public opinion for 50 years. Why would it start now?

- Click here for the article.

We argue that understanding how public opinion may affect court decisions depends crucially on the Warren Court era (1953-1969). The Warren Court was historically liberal at a time when overall public opinion was also trending liberal. As a result, court decisions and public opinion were pretty strongly correlated during these years.

But if you set aside the Warren Court era, the picture changes. To show this, we drew on a measure of public opinion created by political scientist James Stimson. This measure combines survey questions about a wide range of topics into a single measure of the relative liberalism or conservatism of the American public. Higher values on this measure indicate a relatively more liberal public. Obviously, public opinion is more complex than this single measure, but it nicely captures the overall ideological “mood” of the countr
y.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Public Opinion and the Supreme Court

Here's a book review that combines the topics we're covering in both 2301 and 2302 this week. The author suggests that public opinion plays a bigger role in Supreme Court decisions than is generally appreciated:

. . . liberal commentators who fear that the Roberts Court could shift dramatically to the right in the coming years betray a lack of historical perspective. The Court will inevitably march to the tune that the American public plays. “The decisions of the justices on the meaning of the Constitution must be ratified by the American people,” Friedman matter-of-factly explains. “That’s just the way it is.” A Supreme Court decision, on this understanding, bears a resemblance to an opening bid in a hand of poker. “It is through the process of judicial responsiveness to public opinion that the meaning of the Constitution takes shape,” Friedman writes. “The Court rules. The public responds. Over time, sometimes a long period, public opinion jells, and the Court comes into line with the considered views of the American public.” In his account, the views of Supreme Court justices are, in comparison to the views of the American public, of trifling significance. “Ultimately, it is the people (and the people alone) who must decide what the Constitution means,” Friedman proclaims. And so the left need not gnash its teeth over the replacement of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor with Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., or about any other personnel decisions for that matter, because “the long-run fate of the Roberts Court is not seriously in doubt; its decisions will fall tolerably within the mainstream of public opinion, or the Court will be yanked back into line.”


The reviewer begs to differ.

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

For our look at the media

- Propaganda. 

Propaganda is communication that is primarily used to influence or persuade an audience to further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be selectively presenting facts to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is being presented.[1] Propaganda can be found in news and journalism, government, advertising, entertainment, education, and activism[2] and is often associated with material which is prepared by governments as part of war efforts, political campaigns, health campaigns, revolutionaries, big businesses, ultra-religious organizations, the media, and certain individuals such as soapboxers.


- Public Relations.

Public relations (PR) is the practice of managing and disseminating information from an individual or an organization (such as a business, government agency, or a nonprofit organization) to the public in order to affect their public perception. Public relations (PR) and publicity differ in that PR is controlled internally, whereas publicity is not controlled and contributed by external parties.[1] Public relations may include an organization or individual gaining exposure to their audiences using topics of public interest and news items that do not require direct payment.[2] The exposure mostly is media-based. This differentiates it from advertising as a form of marketing communications. Public relations aims to create or obtain coverage for clients for free, also known as earned media, rather than paying for marketing or advertising also known as paid media. But in the early 21st century, advertising is also a part of broader PR activities.


- Opinion Leaders.

Opinion leadership is leadership by an active media user who interprets the meaning of media messages or content for lower-end media users. Typically opinion leaders are held in high esteem by those who accept their opinions. Opinion leadership comes from the theory of two-step flow of communication propounded by Paul Lazarsfeld and Elihu Katz.[1] Significant developers of the theory have been Robert K. Merton, C. Wright Mills and Bernard Berelson.[2] This theory is one of several models that try to explain the diffusion of innovations, ideas, or commercial products.

Opinion leaders play an important role in information flow, because we tend to seek advice from others in the social environment. Information from the mass media does not directly flow to the target audiences, but through a mediation process, in which influential people digest the information and spread it to the public. Opinion leaders have certain characteristics that make them influential in the decision-making process and the behavior of the public. Through knowledge sharing, opinion leaders may help others do jobs better, facilitate personal development and improve personal recognition.


-
 Social Media.

Social media are interactive digital channels that facilitate the creation and sharing of information, ideas, interests, and other forms of expression through virtual communities and networks.[1][2] While challenges to the definition of social media arise[3][4] due to the variety of stand-alone and built-in social media services currently available, there are some common features:[2]

Social media are interactive Web 2.0 Internet-based applications.[2][5]
User-generated content—such as text posts or comments, digital photos or videos, and data generated through all online interactions—is the lifeblood of social media.[2][5]

Users create service-specific profiles for the website or app that are designed and maintained by the social media organization.[2][6]

Social media helps the development of online social networks by connecting a user's profile with those of other individuals or groups.[2][6]

The term "social" in regard to media suggests that platforms are user-centric and enable communal activity. As such, social media can be viewed as online facilitators or enhancers of human networks—webs of individuals who enhance social connectivity.

Monday, November 21, 2022

Week 13: Public Policy and Equal Treatment of the Law

What is Public Policy?
- What Is Public Policy?
- What is a Market?
- What is Market Failure?
- Private Goods, Market Failure, and Public Goods.
- Public Goods - What are they? What types exist?
- The Public Policy Process.


Public Opinion and the Media.
- State Political Culture.
- Public Opinion.
- Public Opinion and the Policy Agenda.
- The Issue Attention Cycle.
- Wikipedia: Agenda-setting theory.
- From the Monkey Cage: Rich people rule!
- Wikipedia: Political Movements.
- Political Movements.
- Zone of Acquiescence.
- Overton Window.


What is Equal Treatment of the Law?
- Unequal Treatment.
- Equal Treatment / Civil Rights.
- 14th Amendment.
- Equal Protection Clause.
- From the Brennan Center: The History of Corporate Personhood.
- LII: Civil Rights.
- Civil Rights Laws, Authorities, and Regulations.
- Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- Civil Rights: US Supreme Court Decisions.
- Strict Scrutiny.



GOVT 2306
Public Policy in Texas
- affirmative action
- agenda setting
- available school fund
- capture
- Children's Health Insurance Program
- foundation school fund
- means-tested fund
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- permanent school fund
- redistributive policies
- Temporary Assistance to Needy Families
- vouchers


2306: Chapter 11: Criminal Justice
- Rights of the Accused
- Probable Cause
- Search and Seizure
- Indigent Defense
- Victims Rights
- Misdemeanors
- Felonies
- Drug Crimes
- Juvenile Crime
- Pre Trial
- Bail
- Prosecutor
- Arraignment
- Grand Jury
- Plea Bargain
- Trial
- Voir Dire
- No Contest
- Punishment
- Physical Labor
- Probation
- Community Supervision
- Deferred Adjudication
- Incarceration
- TDCJ
- Overcrowding
- Crime Rate
- Drug Court Reform
- Privatization
- Death Penalty
- Life After Prison
- Collateral Consequences
- Restricted Licensing, Employment, and Access to Programs
- Voting Rights
- Criminal Disenfranchisement
- Parole
- Reforms
- Alternatives to Incarceration
- Bail Reforms
- Addressing Prison Suicides
- Aging Prison Population
- Death Penalty Reform


__________

Terminology: 

Public Policy
Public Goods
Externalities
Monopolies
Information
Federalism
National
- Commerce
- - Fiscal Policy
- - Monetary Policy
- Defense
Deficiencies of the Article of Confederation
Statutory Code
- delegated powers
- implied powers
States
- police powers
Texas
- Articles in the Constitution
Statutory Code
Fiscal Size Up
- areas
Local Government
Municipal Code of Ordinances

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Review for 2301 Test Four

The following should help you on the next test. Please try to be familiar with these terms and concepts prior to our upcoming classes.

freedom of speech
public opinion
values
opinions
political ideology
liberalism
conservatism
common fundamental values
equality of opportunity
individual freedom
democracy
political socialization
agents of socialization
the family
social groups
gender gap
education
political conditions
political knowledge
how government shapes public opinion
how private groups shape public opinion
public opinion polling
sample
population
probability sampling
selectivity bias
1936 Literary Digest Poll
margin of error
push polling
illusion of saliency
bandwagon effect
interest groups
freedom of association
NAACP v Alabama
lobbies
factions
pluralism
decentralization of government
economic interests
business organizations
professional organizations
public interest
The Christian Coalition
leadership
political entrepreneur
membership
the upper class bias
the prisoner’s dilemma
the free rider problem
selective benefits
lobbying
grassroot organizations
microsofted
access
electioneering
1995 Lobbying Disclosure Act
using the courts (test cases)
amicus curiae
going public
political action committees
bribery
Texas Ethics Commission
issue advocacy groups
initiative
the media
broadcast media
print media
online media
changes in technology
regulations of broadcast media
FCC
Telecommunications Act of 1996
equal time rule
right of rebuttal
fairness doctrine
freedom of the press
prior restraint
Pentagon Papers
Near v. Minnesota
ownership of media
homogenization of the news
nationalization of the news
journalism
reporting
interpreting
selection bias
names of major newspapers
political influence on news
sound bites
media consumers
encouraging conflict
media impact on politics
agenda setting
priming
framing
media impact on elections
adversarial journalism

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Can public opinion be manipulated? If so how?

Manipulating public opinion turns democracy over on its head. Instead of leaders following the general population due to the opinions they hold, leaders convince the population to think certain ways. They can then create the opinions they choose to follow. This is a tactic commonly used in elections and by the political branches. Its what press conferences and media consultants are all about.

And its also what the public relations industry does. Click here for background on Edward Bernays, who is considered to be the father of public relations, and the subtle use of propaganda to entice the general public to arrive at preferred conclusions to public policy options. If successful, elected leaders can get the public to consent to things they might not otherwise consent to.

Here's a definition of public relations: the practice of managing the flow of information between an individual or an organization and the public.

Maybe the most famous current commentator who argues about the manipulation of public opinion - what he calls manufactured consent - is Noam Chomsky, but its a point made by many others.

More links to follow.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Is the Republican Party broken?

Next week we will start discussing political parties in both 2305 and 2306. Conventional wisdom has held for a while that the Republican Party needs major adjustments in order to become competitive again. Its important to not that as recently as 2004 the same things were said about the Democratic Party, so things can change quickly.

Here's an article from March suggesting that this story may be inaccurate.

Its contains a little insight about public opinion that'll be worth talking about next week. Public opinion tends to move away from the position of the party in power:

Voters serve as “thermostats” for public policy.  They move in the opposite direction as the party controlling the White House—to the left under Republican administrations and to the right under Democratic administrations.  It is as if when the government does too much, or is “too hot,” the public says “cool it.”  And when the government does too little, or is “too cold,” the public says “turn up the heat in here.”
So after Obama was elected in 2008, thermostatic public opinion soon moved against him.   See the graph below, which uses an omnibus measure of the public’s support for government programs that was created by political scientist James Stimson from hundreds of different survey questions.  In this graph, the absolute numbers are arbitrary; by itself, “50” doesn’t mean anything.  The key is how the numbers shift over time.


publicmood

Under Reagan, the public became more liberal, in contrast to the prevailing view that Reagan’s skills as a communicator made the public more conservative.  During the Obama administration, as during the Clinton administration, there has been another shift to the right.  Far from ushering in a liberal majority, the Obama administration has presided over a shift among Americans toward preferring less government, not more government.  Obama has helped to increase the overall conservatism of the American public more than Reagan ever did, ironically enough.

Friday, March 21, 2025

Dear ChatGPT: What powers can presidents use to expand their influence over the legislature and judiciary?

Presidents in the United States have several constitutional and informal powers at their disposal that can be used to expand their influence over both the legislature (Congress) and the judiciary. These powers allow the president to shape policy, control appointments, and even influence legislative and judicial decisions. Here's a breakdown of how presidents can exercise influence over each branch:

1. Influence Over the Legislature (Congress)

a. Veto Power

  • Constitutional Power: The President has the authority to veto legislation passed by Congress (Article I, Section 7). This power gives the President a significant lever to influence the legislative process. While Congress can override a veto with a two-thirds majority, the veto power provides the President with the ability to block or force changes to legislation.

  • Use: A President can use the veto strategically to reject bills they disagree with, forcing Congress to reconsider or modify proposals. This can be used to influence the legislative agenda or prevent unwanted laws from passing.

b. Executive Orders

  • Constitutional Power: While primarily a tool for the executive branch, executive orders allow the President to set policies and direct the actions of federal agencies without the need for legislative approval. This can effectively bypass Congress if needed, especially when legislative gridlock occurs.

  • Use: By issuing executive orders, a President can influence national policy on key issues like immigration, healthcare, and environmental regulations, which may shift the legislative balance in their favor.

c. State of the Union Address

  • Informal Power: The President delivers the State of the Union address to Congress annually, which gives them an opportunity to outline their legislative agenda and set the tone for the year. This is a significant moment for public persuasion and influencing Congress.

  • Use: Presidents use the State of the Union to rally support for their policies, mobilize public opinion, and pressure legislators to pass key bills.

d. Bargaining and Persuasion

  • Informal Power: Presidents can use their bully pulpit (the power to speak out and be heard on any matter) to persuade or pressure members of Congress to support their policies. This can be through public speeches, meetings, or direct negotiations with congressional leaders.

  • Use: Presidents often use their influence and popularity to persuade members of Congress to back their legislative initiatives, offering political favors, personal relationships, or party pressure as incentives.

e. Party Leadership

  • Informal Power: As the head of their political party, the President can influence party members in Congress to support their agenda. This is particularly powerful if the President's party controls both chambers of Congress.

  • Use: Presidents often push party members in Congress to support their policies by leveraging party loyalty, campaign support, and other political advantages.

f. Budget Proposal Power

  • Constitutional Power: The President submits an annual budget request to Congress, which outlines the administration’s priorities for federal spending.

  • Use: While Congress holds the "power of the purse," the President can influence legislative priorities by proposing a budget that emphasizes certain policies or funding levels, shaping debates over public spending.

g. Appointment of Cabinet Members and Agency Heads

  • Constitutional Power: The President nominates individuals to head federal agencies and departments, which are often key to the implementation of laws passed by Congress.

  • Use: By appointing loyal or ideologically aligned individuals to key positions, the President can ensure that their policy preferences are implemented, giving them indirect influence over legislative priorities and the interpretation of laws passed by Congress.


2. Influence Over the Judiciary

a. Judicial Appointments

  • Constitutional Power: The President has the power to nominate judges to the federal courts, including the Supreme Court (with the advice and consent of the Senate). This is one of the most significant ways a President can shape the judiciary.

  • Use: The President’s appointments can have a long-lasting impact on the judicial landscape, as federal judges serve for life. By nominating judges with similar political and ideological views, a President can influence how laws are interpreted for decades.

b. Pardoning Power

  • Constitutional Power: The President has the power to grant pardons and commutations for federal offenses, which can have implications for judicial decisions and the interpretation of laws.

  • Use: The pardon power can be used strategically to forgive individuals or to influence public opinion about certain legal issues. For example, Presidents may grant pardons to individuals whose cases involve legal principles they wish to highlight or promote.

c. Executive Orders and Directives Affecting the Judiciary

  • Constitutional Power: While presidents can’t directly override judicial decisions through executive orders, they can use executive actions to direct how the executive branch interacts with or implements judicial rulings.

  • Use: For instance, if a court ruling is unpopular with the President, they might issue an executive order limiting the impact of the decision or directing agencies on how to implement it, although such actions could be subject to judicial review.

d. Influence Over Public Opinion and Legal Precedent

  • Informal Power: A President can influence public opinion about certain legal issues and pressure courts through speeches, public statements, or the media. By framing legal issues in a particular way, the President can influence how courts view cases or legal principles.

  • Use: While courts are supposed to be independent, the public pressure exerted by a President can affect the judiciary's willingness to rule in certain ways, especially on contentious issues that have strong public support or opposition.

e. Enforcement of Court Decisions

  • Constitutional Power: The President is responsible for enforcing federal laws and court decisions, including those handed down by the Supreme Court and lower federal courts.

  • Use: Although the courts have the final say on legal matters, the President has significant discretion in how to enforce rulings. A President may use this discretion to either speed up or slow down the implementation of certain judicial decisions, potentially influencing the broader legal landscape.

f. Appointing U.S. Attorneys and Legal Advisors

  • Constitutional Power: The President appoints U.S. Attorneys who prosecute federal cases, and the President also nominates legal advisors for key roles in the executive branch.

  • Use: By appointing individuals who share the President’s legal philosophy, they can shape how laws are prosecuted and interpreted at the federal level, potentially influencing judicial outcomes in the future.


Conclusion:

Through these various powers, the President can significantly influence both the legislature and the judiciary. While the Constitution provides formal powers like vetoes, appointments, and pardons, informal powers like party leadership, persuasion, and public communication also play a vital role in shaping the direction of both legislative and judicial action. The combination of constitutional authority and informal influence allows Presidents to play a central role in guiding national policy and the interpretation of the law.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Should Elected Leaders Follow Public Opinion?

For 2301 as we cover public opinion: Matt Bai notes that after hailing the Bush-Cheney Administration for being principled enough to ignore public opinion when they felt they had to, Republicans now assail Obama for doing the same. What role should public opinion play in governing decisions?

Note that the author points out the importance of the precise nature of the claims Democrats and Republicans have used to frame their accusations that the other party was being unfair, even to the point of using focus groups to make sure that the terminology was effective.

Democrats accused Republicans of "changing the rules in the middle of the game" when they considered changing rules concerning filibuster over judicial nominees. Now Republicans are accusing Democrats of having "rammed [health care reform] down the throats of the American people." in both cases the phrases were repeated over and over by various members of Congress to make sure the point was not missed.

Thursday, March 23, 2023

Is Putin influenced by public opinion in Russia

Maybe not

- US intel skeptical Putin will be swayed by Russian public opinion over war in Ukraine.

 

US intelligence officials are skeptical that any change in Russian public opinion against the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine – even a dramatic one – would have an effect in persuading Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the conflict, according to multiple sources familiar with the latest intelligence.

Officials also doubt that the war, which many strategists believe has been an unmitigated disaster for Russia’s military, is likely to lead to the removal of Putin from power, at least in the short term.

That assessment reflects the extent to which officials believe Putin has cemented his control over Russia during his more than two decades in power. Although intelligence officials believe Putin is keenly sensitive to small shifts in public opinion, his ability to crack down on protests and control the media still helps insulate him against any significant popular uprising – leaving him free to prosecute the war on his own terms.

Sunday, October 26, 2025

Dear ChatGPT: What factors drive public opinion formation?

Public opinion formation is shaped by a combination of psychological, social, and informational factors.

Here are the main drivers:


1. Political Socialization

Definition: The lifelong process through which individuals acquire political beliefs and values.
Key Influences:
- Family: Often the strongest early influence.
- Schools: Teach civic knowledge and democratic values.
- Peers: Reinforce or challenge existing views.
- Religious institutions: Shape moral and social attitudes that influence political opinions.


2. Media Influence

- Agenda-setting: Media determines which issues are considered important.
- Framing: The way issues are presented affects how people interpret them.
- Priming: Media coverage influences which criteria people use to evaluate leaders or policies.
- Social media: Allows for rapid spread of information and misinformation, shaping perceptions.


3. Group Identity

- Race, ethnicity, gender, religion, and class all influence perspectives on policy and politics.
- People often align their opinions with the groups they identify with (known as group solidarity).


4. Partisanship and Ideology
- Party identification is one of the strongest predictors of opinions on political issues.
- Political ideology (liberal, conservative, etc.) provides a consistent framework for interpreting new information.


5. Political Leaders and Elites
- Public figures and opinion leaders (politicians, activists, commentators) shape views through persuasion and cue-giving — people take cues from trusted figures within their ideological camp.


6. Events and Experiences

- Major events — such as wars, economic crises, pandemics, or social movements — can rapidly reshape public opinion.
- Personal experiences with government (e.g., taxes, education, policing) can reinforce or challenge beliefs.


7. Education and Information

- Higher education levels are often linked to greater political awareness and more stable opinions.
- The quality and diversity of information sources affect how well citizens can evaluate political issues.


8. Cultural and Historical Context

- Long-standing cultural traditions, regional differences, and national history frame how issues are understood (for example, attitudes toward individualism, government authority, or freedom).

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Edward Bernays and the Rise of Public Relations

Something must be in the air, but some commentators -- Glenn Beck among them -- have focused attention on Edward Bernays, held to be the father of the public relations industry, if not modern adversing in general. A month back the Economist ran an article on Bernays and one of his predescessors, Ivy Lee, who figured out how to persuade the public to think one way about a dominant issue. This is handy if you are a vested interest that needs to deal with a crisis:

Lee observed that the rise of national newspaper chains and syndicated journalism in America since the 1880s, combined with the extension of the franchise, had profoundly changed society. Now, for the first time, there was something that could accurately be called “public opinion”, a shared consciousness and conversation across the country—and it was to be feared. Lee noted how the emerging mass media were acting as the conduit for the anti-capitalist message of Progressivism, the liberalising reform movement that peaked in America in the early 20th century. He realised not only that it was essential for businesses to counter this message, but that the same conduit could be used to spread pro-business sentiment.

His idea, blindingly obvious now but a novelty then, was to send newsdesks a stream of statements putting the mining bosses’ case and rebutting allegations against them. These, as well as the statements he put out the same year on behalf of a railway following a train crash, are now sometimes described (with a bit of spin) as the first press releases. . .
The sentence regarding public opinion is especially important. I want my 2301s especially to read through this since we will be digging into how interest grousp anbd parties form and communicate, and of course, public opinion in general, soon enough.

To give you an idea of how effective they can be, here's a classic scene from Mad Men.

You might want to think about this and peruse through some presidential campaign ads.

Monday, April 19, 2021

GOVT 2305 HCC - Key Terms

6 - Public Opinion and Political Socialization
public opinion
poll
sample
population
sampling error
direction
intensity
salience
political socialization
agents of socialization
primary: family, school, church
secondary: peers, media, leaders, events
political thought
filters
party identification
selective perception
partisanship
political ideology
liberal
conservative
economic ideology
cultural ideology
populist
libertarian
group orientation
religion
economic class
region
race and ethnicity
gender
generations and age
crosscutting groups
influence of public opinion on policy
delegate
trustee
politico
limits on the publics influence
oligarchy
plutocracy
manufactured consent
the boundaries of action

Chapter 5 - Equal Rights: Struggling toward Fairness
civil rights
equal rights
equality through law
14th Amendment
equal protection clause
segregation in schools
Brown v Board 1 and 2
de jure and de facto segregation
busing
Swann
judicial tests of equal protection
reasonable basis
strict scrutiny
suspect classification
Rostker v Goldberg
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Voting Rights Act of 1965
Shelby v Holder
Civil Rights Act of 1968
housing
redlining
affirmative action
bakke
adarand
grutter
fischer v ut
struggle for equality
Black americans
partisanship
NAACP
Women
english common law
Seneca falls
15th and 19th amendments
FMLA
Hispanic americans
LULAC
MALDEF
growth
farm labor
undocumented labor
Native americans
manifest destiny
displacement
treaties
Bureau of Indian Affairs
AIM
Asian americans
Lau v Nichols
Others
Age
Disabilities
LGBTQ
Obergefell v Hodges

Chapter 15 - Economic and Environmental Policy
TARP
economy
laissez - faire economics
mixed economy
FDA
regulation
deregulation
new federalism
under regulation
economic efficiency
promoting competition
ICC
FTC
economic equity
FLSA
labor unions
progressive era
new deal
EPA
FCC
SEC
Dodd-Frank
externalities
silent spring
climate change
energy policy
NOAA
United Nations
promoting business
loans – tax breaks
NLRA
cooperative federalism
promoting agriculture
economic tool
fiscal policy
demand side economics
depression
recession
supply side economics
budget deficit
national debt
balanced budget
monetary policy
federal reserve system
controlling inflation

16 – Income, Welfare, and Education
income politics
income redistribution
progressive income tax
income tax brackets
GI Bill
tax policy and income inequality
capital gains tax
CBO
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Wage Stagflation
manufacturing
service: banking, rental services, health care, entertainment, fast food, housekeeping
minimum wage
TPP
NAFTA
welfare policies
poverty line
public assistance programs
expanding federal role
cooperative federalism
WPA
ADC / AFDC / TANF
Social Security
Medicare / Medicaid
Welfare Reform Act of 1996
ACA of 2010
public assistance
eligibility
means test
in-kind benefit
social insurance
entitlement programs
AARP
EITC
Education policies
equality of opportunity
public education
leveling
federal role
grants in aid
War on Poverty
Higher Education Act 1965
partisan conflicts
economic security

Chapter 17 – Foreign Policy
TPP
NATO
CIA
NSA
WTOIMF
World Bank
isolationism
internationalist
bipolar
Cold War
containment
unipolar
multilateralism
war on terrorism
preemptive war doctrine
commander in chief
unilateralism
military policy
MAD
conventional and unconventional war
transnational terrorism
WND
Military industrial complex
foreign trade
economic globalization
tariffs
free trade
protectionism
america first
USMCA
hard power
soft power

Monday, October 18, 2021

Additional terms related to the media

- Propaganda: 

Propaganda is communication that is primarily used to influence an audience and further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be selectively presenting facts to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is being presented.[1] Propaganda can be found in news and journalism, government, advertising, entertainment, education, and activism[2] and is often associated with material which is prepared by governments as part of war efforts, political campaigns, revolutionaries, big businesses, ultra-religious organisations, the media, and certain individuals such as soapboxers.

In the 20th century, the term propaganda was often associated with a manipulative approach, but historically, propaganda has been a neutral descriptive term.[1][3]

A wide range of materials and media are used for conveying propaganda messages, which changed as new technologies were invented, including paintings, cartoons, posters, pamphlets, films, radio shows, TV shows, and websites. More recently, the digital age has given rise to new ways of disseminating propaganda, for example, bots and algorithms are currently being used to create computational propaganda and fake or biased news and spread it on social media.


- Public Relations.

Public relations (PR) is the practice of managing and disseminating information from an individual or an organization (such as a business, government agency, or a nonprofit organization) to the public in order to affect their public perception. Public relations (PR) and publicity differ in that PR is controlled internally, whereas publicity is not controlled and contributed by external parties.[1] Public relations may include an organization or individual gaining exposure to their audiences using topics of public interest and news items that do not require direct payment.[2] The exposure mostly is media based. This differentiates it from advertising as a form of marketing communications. Public relations aims to create or obtain coverage for clients for free, also known as earned media, rather than paying for marketing or advertising also known as paid media. But in the early 21st century, advertising is also a part of broader PR activities.[3]

An example of good public relations would be generating an article featuring a PR firm's client, rather than paying for the client to be advertised next to the article.[4] The aim of public relations is to inform the public, prospective customers, investors, partners, employees, and other stakeholders, and ultimately persuade them to maintain a positive or favorable view about the organization, its leadership, products, or political decisions. Public relations professionals typically work for PR and marketing firms, businesses and companies, government, and public officials as public information officers and nongovernmental organizations, and nonprofit organizations. Jobs central to public relations include account coordinator, account executive, account supervisor, and media relations manager.[5]

Public relations specialists establish and maintain relationships with an organization's target audience, the media, relevant trade media, and other opinion leaders. Common responsibilities include designing communications campaigns, writing press releases and other content for news, working with the press, arranging interviews for company spokespeople, writing speeches for company leaders, acting as an organization's spokesperson, preparing clients for press conferences, media interviews and speeches, writing website and social media content, managing company reputation (crisis management), managing internal communications, and marketing activities like brand awareness and event management.[6] Success in the field of public relations requires a deep understanding of the interests and concerns of each of the company's many stakeholders. The public relations professional must know how to effectively address those concerns using the most powerful tool of the public relations trade, which is publicity

- Censorship.

Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".[2][3][4] Censorship can be conducted by governments,[5] private institutions, and other controlling bodies.

Governments[5] and private organizations may engage in censorship. Other groups or institutions may propose and petition for censorship.[6] When an individual such as an author or other creator engages in censorship of his or her own works or speech, it is referred to as self-censorship. General censorship occurs in a variety of different media, including speech, books, music, films, and other arts, the press, radio, television, and the Internet for a variety of claimed reasons including national security, to control obscenity, child pornography, and hate speech, to protect children or other vulnerable groups, to promote or restrict political or religious views, and to prevent slander and libel.

Direct censorship may or may not be legal, depending on the type, location, and content. Many countries provide strong protections against censorship by law, but none of these protections are absolute and frequently a claim of necessity to balance conflicting rights is made, in order to determine what could and could not be censored. There are no laws against self-censorship.

Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Terminology for UH - Module Three

Chapter 6 - Public Opinion
- public opinion
- values
- beliefs
- liberty
- equality
- traditionalism
- political ideology
- Attitudes
- Opinions
- political values
- liberalism
- conservatism
- libertarianism
- socialism
- political socialization
- agents of socialization
- family
- friends
- social groups
- race
- ethnicity
- gender gap
- religion
- party affiliation
- economic class
- self interest
- political leaders
- charismatic authority
- mass media
- marketplace of ideas
- stability
- change
- political knowledge
- shortcuts
- cues
- schemas
- skim and scan


Chapter 7 – The Media
- role of the media
- - information
- - forum
- - watchdog
- internet freedom
- journalism
- profit motive
- advertising revenue
- public broadcasting
- media conglomerates
- hard news|
- soft news
- mass media
- media platforms
- digital citizens
- digital divide
- social media
- citizen journalism
- fake news
- misinformation
- influence on public opinion
- influence on politics
- agenda setting
- gatekeeper
- framing
- priming


Chapter 8 - Political Participation and Voting
- Forms of political participation
- Protest
- In Elections
- Voting
- Suffrage
- Voter Turnout
- Traditional Participation
- Digital
- Expressive Politics
- Election Interference
- Voter Suppression



Chapter 5 – Civil Rights
- discrimination
- civil rights
- equal protection clause
- women’s rights movement
- civil war amendments
- reconstruction
- black codes
- jim crow
- Plessy v Ferguson
- separate but equal
- NAACP
- NAWSA
- Sweatt v Painter
- Shelly v Kramer
- Brown v Board
- strict scrutiny
- de jure
- de facto
- school desegregation
- Civil Rights Acts
- public accommodations
- CRA Title VII – employment
- EEOC
- Voting Rights Act
- gerrymandering
- Shelby County v Holder
- Housing
- CRA of 1968
- Fair Housing Act
- HUD
- redlining
- marriage
- mass incarceration