Monday, May 12, 2025

From Black's Lw Dictionary: The Four Pillars of the Rule of Law

- Click here for it

The concept of the rule of law goes back to ancient times and it can essentially be summed up by the well-known phrase, “nobody is above the law.” In other words, in a governing system based on the rule of law, everybody is held equally accountable under the same laws. In contrast, a system that is based upon the rule of men, such as a tyranny, monarchy, theocracy, or oligarchy, occurs when governance, laws, and the administration of justice are determined by the interests of a single person or group of people. While rule of law is a fundamental principal in many countries today, the World Justice Project points out that effective rule of law itself depends on the upholding of the following four principles.

The law applies to everyone

Perhaps one of the defining features of the rule of law is that, under such a system, the law is applied equally to all citizens, including the lawmakers themselves. Rule of law simply means that the law itself, rather than individuals or organizations, reigns supreme. Therefore, even people who enforce and administer the law, such as police officers, judges, and lawyers, are still subject to the same laws as everybody else is.

The laws are not secret or arbitrary

For a rule of law system to function, the laws themselves must be public, fair, stable, and understandable. If the laws change too frequently or arbitrarily, or the laws themselves are not publicized, then citizens have little hope of being able to abide by those laws. Furthermore, the laws must not violate fundamental human rights, which would again make them unfair to citizens.

The laws are enforced fairly

It’s one thing for the laws to be written fairly, but if they are enforced in such a way that is either arbitrary or unfair then the rule of law begins to break down. For example, if a jurisdiction passes laws against drug use, but then only enforces those laws against a particular ethnic minority or social group, then the laws are not being enforced fairly. Citizens living under a rule of law system have a right to know that the laws are being administered and enforced in a way that is fair and accessible.

The justice system is fair

Not only must laws be enforced in a fair and non-arbitrary manner, but so too must justice be delivered in a way that is fair, accessible, and efficient. In other words, the judicial system must stand independent of outside interference, such as by politicians or law enforcement agencies. Instead, the justice system must function to administer the law in such a way that citizens can expect to be treated fairly, regardless of their race, gender, beliefs, or economic status.

The rule of law is foundational to many functioning governments around the world. By limiting the arbitrary exercise of power by a single person or group, the rule of law helps establish a system whereby the fundamental rights and dignity of individuals and groups within a country are respected. While the rule of law is rarely perfectly applied, it is an ideal towards which many countries continue to strive.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

From the Texas Tribune: In bail talks, lawmakers close in on Texas GOP goal of keeping defendants in jail

Bail reform was one of the lieutenant governor's emergency items.

Here's an update.

Click here for the article.

. . . the proposal’s momentum in the House this session reflects a years long shift in Texas away from efforts to curtail mass incarceration, reduce wealth-based detention and keep nonviolent offenders out of jail. Instead, under Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, state leaders have swerved toward a tough-on-crime approach to legislating, including through bills that would likely grow the state’s incarcerated population, increase penalties for various crimes and exempt police from deadly conduct charges. And while they have failed to amend the Constitution’s bail provisions, GOP lawmakers have approved more modest changes restricting access to cashless personal bonds, needing only majority support to send the legislation to Abbott’s desk.

Some relevant legislation: 

- SB 9.
- SB 40.
- SJR 1.
- SJR 5.

For a list of all bills related to crime, click on any of the subjects below: 

Crime Prevention
Crime Victims Compensation
Crimes--Against Morals
Crimes--Against Persons
Crimes--Against Persons--Sexual
Crimes--Against Property
Crimes--Capital Punishment
Crimes--Drugs
Crimes--Juvenile
Crimes--Miscellaneous
Criminal Procedure--Bail & Pretrial Release
Criminal Procedure--Defense Counsel
Criminal Procedure--General
Criminal Procedure--Insanity Defense
Criminal Procedure--Post trial Procedure
Criminal Procedure--Pretrial Procedure
Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment
Criminal Procedure--Trial

From the Texas Tribune: School board races across Texas deal losses for many conservatives

Pendulums tend to swing.

- Click here for the article

Conservative school board candidates across Texas suffered an array of defeats in Saturday’s local elections, marking a clear setback for the Republican-aligned movement to shape how grade school curriculums and library books confront issues of race, sex and gender.

The sweeping losses for conservative school board hopefuls also served as an early sign of potential backlash to the nascent administration of President Donald Trump, ahead of a 2026 midterm in which a number of statewide offices will be on the ballot. Midterm elections historically have spelled trouble for the incumbent president’s party in down-ballot races.

Saturday’s elections saw the defeat of numerous conservative school board trustees in the Tarrant County suburbs surrounding Fort Worth, the epicenter of the state’s recent culture war fights over how students should learn about race and gender. All seven school board candidates in contested races who were endorsed by the Tarrant County Republican Party lost their elections.

The fight dates back to 2022, when a network of conservative donors and groups led by Patriot Mobile Action — a North Texas Christian nationalist PAC funded by a cellphone company — backed a slate of 11 school board candidates around the area, 10 of whom won their elections. That included major gains on the Mansfield ISD board, where the newfound conservative majority gave itself oversight over which library books could be added to school shelves, presaging a proposal now making its way through the Legislature.

All three Mansfield ISD trustees up for reelection Saturday had been backed by Patriot Mobile Action and were endorsed this year by the Tarrant County GOP; all three lost their reelection bids. The party’s pick for Mansfield mayor, Julie Short, also failed to unseat incumbent Michael Evans.

Conservatives also racked up losses on the nearby Arlington, Grapevine-Colleyville and Keller ISD boards. Keller ISD trustees have drawn statewide attention over a 2022 policy that, in practice, allowed community members to block proposed book purchases.

For more: 

In Mansfield, re-elected Mayor says voters sent a message: "People are tired of the uber partisanship" .

Election results: Mansfield mayor declares victory, Place 5 headed to runoff.

 


Tuesday, May 6, 2025

https://communityimpact.com/houston/pearland-friendswood/development/2025/04/16/renewing-pearland-old-town-pearland-officials-look-to-revitalize-old-town-with-new-plan/

https://chatgpt.com/c/681a3ff2-a0b4-800a-b4e3-376f36fde493

https://www.houstontx.gov/housing/fair-housing/flyers/2021/english/FH-Hotline-Renters-Flyer-Final-V2-081721.pdf

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-weather/forecast/article/tornado-watch-tuesday-southeast-texas-20312631.php

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/06/trump-presidency-news/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/?reload=true&_=1746554064115


Sunday, May 4, 2025

From the Washington Post: Tracking the court actions and lawsuits over Trump’s agenda

For a more detailed look at the uses of the courts to push back against recent executive actions.

- Click here for it

Will the courts determine that these are within the proper parameters of presidential powers?

For Review: Dear CHatGPT: How Can a U.S. President Abuse Executive Power?

From the Texas Tribune: Private school vouchers are now law in Texas. Here’s how they will work.

- Click here for the article

Gov. Greg Abbott on Saturday signed legislation authorizing a private school voucher program into law, marking the grand finale of an oftentimes ugly conflict that has largely defined Texas politics this decade.

Senate Bill 2 will allow families to use public taxpayer dollars to fund their children’s education at an accredited private school or to pay for a wide range of school-related expenses, like textbooks, transportation or therapy. The program will be one of the largest school voucher initiatives in the nation.

“When I ran for reelection in 2022, I promised school choice for the families of Texas. Today, we deliver on that promise,” said Abbott during the bill's signing before hundreds of applauding supporters gathered outside the Governor's Mansion. “Gone are the days that families are limited to only the school assigned by government. The day has arrived that empowers parents to choose the school that’s best for their child.”

The law will go into effect on Sept. 1, with the program expected to launch in late 2026.

For GOVT 2306 - 5/5/25

Winners and losers from Houston-area elections on bond packages, school board races and more.

Gov. Abbott threatens to pull San Marcos funding over 'antisemitic' Israel ceasefire resolution.

U.S. House moves to cut $3.3 billion program that would expand sidewalks in Houston.

Houston council OKs application for $966M loan to build a new East Water Purification Plant.

Exclusive: Houston could face lawsuit if city doesn’t renegotiate or withdraw from transportation council.

After the failed attempt to impeach AG Paxton, state senators wants to change Texas' impeachment law.

Thursday, May 1, 2025

HB 4814
Author: Gerdes
Last Action: 04/03/2025 H Referred to Public Education: Apr 3 2025 12:38PM
Caption: Relating to the display of and allowance for non-human behaviors in Texas schools.

HB 366
Author: Phelan
Last Action: 04/30/2025 S Received from the House
Caption: Relating to required disclosures on certain political advertising that contains altered media; creating a criminal offense.

HB 32
Author: Button | Geren | Moody | Smithee | Leach
Last Action: 04/08/2025 H Reported favorably as substituted
Caption: Relating to the eviction from real property of certain persons not entitled to enter, occupy, or remain in possession of the premises.

For today's 2305 - and probably tomorrow also

Outline United States policies regarding westward emmigration beginning in 1790.

Outline United States policies encouraging agriculture beginning in 1790.

Outline United States policies encouraging the development of cities beginning in 1790.

Outline United States policies encouraging the development of interstate commerce beginning in 1790.

Outline United States policies encouraging the development of interstate transportation beginning in 1790.

Outline United States policies improving interstate communications beginning in 1790.

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Links from 4/28/25

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillespie_County,_Texas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_the_Tank_Engine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_conclave

https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/

https://gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/business/03.03.25_SBFC_Report_FINAL__.pdf

https://www.statista.com/statistics/266292/number-of-pirate-attacks-worldwide-since-2006/#statisticContainer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_sea_mining

https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/

https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/blogs/trump-executive-order-tracker

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/

https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/donald-trump/2025

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/28/us/politics/supreme-court-lawyer-standing-ovation.html

 https://library.municode.com/tx/manvel/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PAIICOOR_CH77ZO_ARTIIDIRE_S77-25OFZOMAESDIBO

https://meridiandevllc.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dockworker

https://communityimpact.com/houston/pearland-friendswood/government/2024/06/18/manvel-approves-10-homestead-exemption/#:~:text=city%20of%20Manvel)-,Homeowners%20in%20Manvel%20will%20now%20have%20a%2010%25%20homestead%20exemption,at%20its%20June%2017%20meeting.

manvel texas tax incentives


Tuesday, April 29, 2025

For 2306 - 4/30/25

Starbase, the SpaceX site, is likely Texas’ next city. What happens next?

Nearly 10 years after SpaceX, Elon Musk’s effort to colonize Mars, began operating in a small community in Cameron County just a few miles inland of the Gulf Coast, employees who live there and other residents will vote next month to incorporate their Starbase community as Texas’ newest city.

If the majority of them vote yes on May 3, the leaders they elect at the same time will have the responsibility of creating a city from the ground up.

What does it take to have a fully functioning city?

A few of Starbase's first steps as a newborn city can be anticipated because state law sets certain requirements for raising and spending public money and how governing bodies can operate.

- State appeals court strikes down Austin’s marijuana decriminalization ordinance.

A Texas appeals court ruled Thursday that the city of Austin cannot enforce its law that prohibits police from citing and arresting people for carrying a small amount of marijuana. This is the second time this month that the appeals court has ruled in favor of the state against ordinances that decriminalize marijuana.

The state's 15th Court of Appeals overturned the decision by Travis County District Judge Jan Soifer, who had dismissed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against Austin last year, ruling that there was no legal justification to try the case. The court determined the city law “abused its discretion” by putting up any barrier to the full enforcement of drug-related laws.

Last week, this same court overturned a lower court ruling that denied a temporary injunction to prevent the city of San Marcos from enforcing its voter-approved ordinance to decriminalize marijuana because it conflicts with current state law.



Texas lawmakers want to exempt police from deadly conduct charges.

When Austin police responded to a 911 call in a downtown high rise in 2019, they confronted Mauris DeSilva a few feet away from the elevator, in a mental health crisis holding a knife.

Christopher Taylor, an on-duty officer, shot and killed DeSilva that night. DeSilva’s father has said his son was not a threat to the police, only to himself. Prosecutors agreed.

Taylor last year was sentenced to two years in a prison for deadly conduct, a charge only a handful of officers have been convicted of in recent history. Lawyers for Taylor after the sentencing have called the prosecution an abuse of power.

Texas lawmakers are now working to make that kind of sentence impossible. House Bill 2436 would exempt law enforcement officers from being charged with deadly conduct for actions taken in the line of duty. The lower chamber is expected to vote on the bill Monday. The Senate approved a nearly identical bill, Senate Bill 1637, earlier this month.



Texas poised to ask voters to approve $3 billion to study dementia.

Texas voters will likely get a chance to decide whether to spend $3 billion in state funds on dementia research after the House preliminarily approved Senate Joint Resolution 3 on Monday.

Both chambers voted earlier this session to create the Dementia Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, to study dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and other brain conditions. Modeled after Texas’ cancer institute, the new initiative was a priority for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and received bipartisan support from the majority of lawmakers.

But it’s not up to them whether taxpayer dollars can be used to fund this project. That decision will lie with the voters, who, after SJR 3 is finally approved by the House, will be asked at the next election whether they want to allocate $3 billion of general revenue to this work.

“I don't know [any one] in this House who doesn't have a family member or a friend or a neighbor … impacted by dementia or Alzheimer's,” said Rep. Senfronia Thompson, a Houston Democrat. “This Constitutional Amendment gives us the funding to do the research so that we can give those persons who are impacted with these dreadful diseases a better quality of life.”



Texas farmers could have greater access to low-interest loans under a bill the Senate is considering.

Texas farmers and ranchers may get a new lifeline from state lawmakers.

The Texas House has approved a bill that expands one of the state’s most successful loan programs for the agriculture industry. That legislation, House Bill 43, is now up for debate in the Senate.

The relief can’t come quickly enough, said state Rep. Stan Kitzman, a Pattison Republican and the bill’s author.

“What House Bill 43 does is it makes funds available to help these producers hang on,” Kitzman said. “It's not subsidies like the federal program. It takes an existing program that's already at the Texas Department of Agriculture — the Young Farmer program — and expands that.”

From ChatGPT: Questions related to economic policy

- What is Economic Policy?

What is Economic Policy on the State and Local Levels?

- Outline the History of United States Economic Policy.

Outline Hamilton's Economic Proposals

What is the History of Debt in the United States?

Why has the United States gone into Debt over its history?

What is the Purpose of a Central Bank?

Sunday, April 27, 2025

From the Texas Tribune regarding recent election legislation in the Texas Leg.

Requiring voters to prove citizenship spurs concern that eligible Texans won’t be able to cast ballots.

The Bill would amend the Texas Election Code.

Subject Areas: 

- Elections--Administration.
- Elections--Election Officers.
- Elections--Registration & Suffrage.

Democratic lawmakers and Texas voters spent nearly four hours at a legislative hearing Thursday demanding to know how a GOP-backed bill to require citizenship proof from voters would work, and warning that it could disenfranchise eligible Texans.

. . . House Bill 5337 goes further than the laws and proposals in some other states, in that it would apply retroactively to already-registered voters in Texas, not just new applicants. Texas has more than 18 million registered voters.

Officials with the Texas Secretary of State’s Office told lawmakers Thursday that they estimate around 500,000 currently registered voters who don’t have a driver’s license number or Social Security number in their voter registration record would have to provide proof of citizenship.


- HB 5337.
- SB 16.

The federal courts have blocked similar laws due to allegations these amount to voter suppression.

Court blocks Arizona’s laws requiring proof of citizenship to vote for president.

See also: 

Texas lawmakers consider barring counties from mailing unsolicited voter registration forms.
Verifying hand-counted ballots in Texas elections may be easier under GOP bill.
Republican lawmakers revive effort to give attorney general more power to prosecute election crimes.
Texas countywide voting bill would allow fewer polling sites.
Some Texas lawmakers want to ban countywide voting on Election Day. Local officials are pushing back.

 https://ij.org/case/martin-v-united-states/listeners-guide-to-martin-v-us/

ATOTP: Fighting for Transparency: How Houston Is Hiding Critical Street Redesign Records

For our look at municipal government.

As well as the availability of information.

- Click here for the article

These are the requests mentioned in the article:

1. Request for the 11th Street Safety Study — Withheld Per Attorney General

2. Request for Communications About Heights Boulevard Barrier Removal — Sent to Attorney General

3. Request for Austin Street Redesign and Removal Documents — Sent to Attorney General

4. Request for Mayor Whitmire’s Communications — Sent to Attorney General

5. Request for Fire Department Feedback Used to Justify Removals — 10-Day Letter Sent to Attorney General

6. Request for Community Feedback and Repaving Costs for Austin Street — Sent to Attorney General

Friday, April 25, 2025

From the Texas Tribune: Abbott signs first bill of session into law, creating a Texas DOGE

The Bill is SB 14: click here to check it out on TLO.

The bill will amend the Texas Government Code.

It emerged from a report from the Governor’s Small Business Freedom Council.

Here are the other bills signed by the governor so far this session.

- Click here for the article.  

Gov. Greg Abbott on Wednesday signed the first law of this year’s legislative session, a bill creating a new regulation-cutting agency inspired by Elon Musk’s federal Department of Government Efficiency.

“Texas can have our own DOGE,” Abbott said Wednesday. “What this law is going to do is make government more efficient and less costly.”

Senate Bill 14, which passed both the House and Senate with bipartisan supermajorities, establishes the “Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office” at a cost of $22.8 million over the next five years.

Abbott signed the bill with Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, House Speaker Dustin Burrows and the bill’s sponsors — Rep. Giovanni Capriglione, R-Southlake, and Sen. Phil King, R-Weatherford — by his side.

“The fewer regulations we have, the more efficient they are, the easier they are to understand — is going to help Texas business and economy continue to boom, which is why I'm excited this is the first bill that is being signed,” Burrows said.

With five weeks left in the biennial legislative session, SB 14 is the first bill to reach Abbott’s desk. The Senate and House have each passed other priority measures — including a school voucher program that Patrick put on a glide path last week when he endorsed the House’s proposal — but some, like the budget, differ slightly across chambers and still require final approval before they can go to the governor.

From Lawfare

A Primer on the Civil Service and the Trump Administration.

Immigration Is Not Invasion.

What Congress Has Done—and What It Still Needs to Do—to Protect NATO.


Constitutional War Powers: Thomas Jefferson and the Barbary Pirates

FBI arrests Milwaukee judge for obstructing immigration arrest at courth...

Links 4/25/25

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_Riders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March%E2%80%93April_2025_United_States_attacks_in_Yemen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_Coast

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/umpteenth

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/subpoena

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/a-reporter-s-notes-of-the-april-23-perkins-coie-hearing

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/25/us/politics/trump-judges-marshals-threats.html

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/04/25/us/trump-news

Thursday, April 24, 2025

Dear CHatGPT: How Can a U.S. President Abuse Executive Power?

A U.S. president can abuse their power in several ways, often by overstepping constitutional limits or using their authority for personal or political gain rather than the public good. Here are some key examples of how that might happen:

1. Obstruction of Justice
- Interfering with investigations, particularly those involving themselves or close allies.
- Firing officials (like FBI directors or inspectors general) who are investigating wrongdoing.

2. Using Government Resources for Personal or Political Gain
- Pressuring foreign governments to take actions that benefit the president politically (e.g., digging up dirt on a political opponent).
- Misusing government funds or assets for campaign purposes or personal enrichment.

3. Violating the Constitution or Laws
- Ignoring court rulings or refusing to comply with lawful subpoenas.
- Declaring emergencies to bypass Congress and redirect funds or implement policies that would otherwise not be approved.

4. Undermining Democratic Institutions
- Attacking the legitimacy of elections without evidence.
- Using federal agencies (like the DOJ, IRS, or DHS) to target political opponents or critics.

5. Pardoning Allies for Corrupt Purposes
- Issuing pardons to friends or associates involved in crimes related to the president’s own actions, possibly to keep them from testifying.

6. Censoring or Controlling Information
- Intimidating the press or manipulating public information through propaganda or misinformation.
- Preventing whistleblowers from coming forward or retaliating against them.

Checks on Presidential Power

While the U.S. president holds significant authority, checks and balances exist:
- Congress can investigate, defund initiatives, or impeach.
- Courts can block unlawful actions.
- The media and public play watchdog roles.
- Elections serve as ultimate accountability.

 https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/24/politics/judge-blocks-trump-proof-of-citizenship-voter-registration/index.html


https://www.votebeat.org/2025/04/24/trump-executive-order-elections-preliminary-injunction/

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/04/23/trump-executive-orders-education-accreditation/

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Bills related to Special Districts

Special Districts & Authorities--Groundwater Conserve Dist.

Special Districts & Authorities--Hospital

Special Districts & Authorities--Miscellaneous

Special Districts & Authorities--Municipal Utility Districts

Special Districts & Authorities--Navigation & Ports

Special Districts & Authorities--River Authorities

Special Districts & Authorities--Soil & Water Conservation

Special Districts & Authorities--Water & Utility

Special Districts & Authorities--Water Control Improve Dist.

For GOVT 2306 - 4/23/25

 - Texas Senate approves bill that could reshape how history and race are taught in state universities.

Texas senators voted 20-11 on Wednesday to approve a bill that would drastically limit how the state's public universities teach their students about history, race and inequality.

Senate Bill 37 passed despite Democrats raising concerns it could lead to a faculty brain drain, self-censorship or lawsuits against the state.

“I’ve got constituents reaching out to me saying this is the death of higher ed,” said Sen. Molly Cook, a Democrat from Houston, during discussion to give the bill initial approval Tuesday.

Democrats also criticized the bill’s author, Republican Sen. Brandon Creighton, for not giving them enough time to review a 13-page amendment he filed shortly before the Tuesday vote was taken. Creighton ultimately agreed to give them 10 minutes to read it. The amendment added that universities would be required to either end or revise degree programs if the state determines the programs do not offer a return on investment for students.


- Click here for Senate Bill 37.


In historic first, Texas House approves private school voucher program.

The Texas House gave final approval Thursday to a bill that would create a $1 billion private school voucher program, crossing a historic milestone and bringing Gov. Greg Abbott’s top legislative priority closer than ever to reaching his desk.

The lower chamber signed off on its voucher proposal, Senate Bill 2, on an 86-61 vote. Every present Democrat voted against the bill. They were joined by two Republicans — far short of the bipartisan coalitions that in previous legislative sessions consistently blocked proposals to let Texans use taxpayer money to pay for their children’s private schooling.

. . . The initial vote came more than 10 hours after the chamber gave preliminary approval to its sweeping $7.7 billion school funding package, which would give local districts more money per student and raise teacher salaries. House Bill 2, which received final passage Thursday on a 142-5 vote, also aims to improve the quality of special education services by allocating funding based on the individual needs of children with disabilities.

- Click here for Senate Bill 2.
- Click here for House Bill 2


Election officials wary of shift to Texas’ centralized voter-registration system.

An effort to force all of Texas’ 254 counties onto the state’s central system for managing voter registration has some election officials concerned about the system’s history of technical problems, its capacity to handle larger volumes of data and the potential for new security risks.

Thirty-two Texas counties, including some of the state’s largest, currently use private vendors for software to handle voter registration and election management tasks. The software helps counties manage information including voters’ addresses, voting history, registration applications, images of signatures for verification, images of mail-ballot envelopes and other personal data.

Pending legislation, Senate Bill 2382, would require counties to exclusively use the state’s system, called Texas Election Administration Management, or TEAM. Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Republican from Houston, filed the bill after many counties last year faced a surprise surcharge from one of the private vendors, Votec.


Click here for Senate Bill 2382.


Why Texas Republicans are trying to rein in high home prices and rents.

For decades, Texas benefited from relatively low home prices and rents, a key component of the state’s ability to lure new residents and employers from more expensive parts of the country.

Now, Texas Republicans find themselves trying to rein in the state’s high housing costs — before it’s too late.

The state’s top Republicans have shown increasing alarm as high housing costs have put homeownership out-of-reach for an increasing number of Texas families, especially young ones. GOP leaders have pointed to figures from Texas Realtors that show the typical homebuyer is getting older. The median age of a Texas homebuyer was 48 in 2020. Last year, it was 58.

. . . There’s political urgency for Republicans to deal with housing affordability. They are increasingly aware that Texans view the state’s high housing costs as a considerable problem. A poll last year showed some 90% of Texans view housing affordability as a problem where they live — an agreement that transcends party lines and whether people live in a big city, suburb or rural town.

Click here for Senate Bill 15

 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/22/us/politics/hegseth-chaos-pentagon.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Monday, April 21, 2025

From THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS: Harvard v. HHS

Hardvard sues the national government in oprder to reinstate their funding.

- Click here for it.

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

- Dear ChatGPT: What is a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief?

A Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief is a legal document that someone (called the plaintiff) files in court to:

- Declaratory Relief – Ask the court to make a legal declaration about the parties’ rights, status, or obligations under a law, contract, or regulation. This is essentially the plaintiff saying: “There’s a legal uncertainty here, and we need the court to officially say who’s right.”

- Injunctive Relief – Ask the court to order someone (usually the defendant) to either:

- - Stop doing something (a prohibitory injunction), or

- - Start doing something (a mandatory injunction).

For more: 

- Harvard Sues Trump Administration Over $2.2 Billion Funding Freeze.

- President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Department of Health and Human Services.

- Harvard sues Trump administration over efforts to ‘gain control of academic decision-making

From Wikipedia: Foreign interventions by the United States

For our look at military policy.

- Click here

The United States government has been involved in numerous interventions in foreign countries throughout its history. The U.S. has engaged in nearly 400 military interventions between 1776 and 2023, with half of these operations occurring since 1950 and over 25% occurring in the post-Cold War period. Common objectives of U.S. foreign interventions have revolved around economic opportunity, social protection, protection of U.S. citizens and diplomats, territorial expansion, fomenting regime change, nation-building, and enforcing international law.

A closer look at the four listed justifications: 

territorial expansion

. . . the expansion of political, economic, cultural, media, and military influence beyond the boundaries of the United States. Depending on the commentator, it may include imperialism through outright military conquest; military protection; gunboat diplomacy; unequal treaties; subsidization of preferred factions; regime change; economic or diplomatic support; or economic penetration through private companies, potentially followed by diplomatic or forceful intervention when those interests are threatened.

fomenting regime change

. . . the partly forcible or coercive replacement of one government regime with another. Regime change may replace all or part of the state's most critical leadership system, administrative apparatus, or bureaucracy. Regime change may occur through domestic processes, such as revolution, coup, or reconstruction of government following state failure or civil war. It can also be imposed on a country by foreign actors through invasion, overt or covert interventions, or coercive diplomacy. Regime change may entail the construction of new institutions, the restoration of old institutions, and the promotion of new ideologies.

According to a dataset by Alexander Downes, 120 leaders were removed through foreign-imposed regime change between 1816 and 2011.

nation-building

. . . constructing or structuring a national identity using the power of the state. Nation-building aims at the unification of the people within the state so that it remains politically stable and viable. According to Harris Mylonas, "Legitimate authority in modern national states is connected to popular rule, to majorities. Nation-building is the process through which these majorities are constructed." In Mylonas's framework, "state elites employ three nation-building policies: accommodation, assimilation, and exclusion."

enforcing international law.

. . . the set of rules, norms, legal customs and standards that states and other actors feel an obligation to, and generally do, obey in their mutual relations. In international relations, actors are simply the individuals and collective entities, such as states, international organizations, and non-state groups, which can make behavioral choices, whether lawful or unlawful. Rules are formal, typically written expectations that outline required behavior, while norms are informal, often unwritten guidelines about appropriate behavior that are shaped by custom and social practice. It establishes norms for states across a broad range of domains, including war and diplomacy, economic relations, and human rights.

From Wikipedia: Territorial Evolution of the United States

For GOVT 2305: 

- Click here

The United States of America was formed after thirteen British colonies in North America declared independence from the British Empire on July 4, 1776. In the Lee Resolution, passed by the Second Continental Congress two days prior, the colonies resolved that they were free and independent states. The union was formalized in the Articles of Confederation, which came into force on March 1, 1781, after being ratified by all 13 states. Their independence was recognized by Great Britain in the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which concluded the American Revolutionary War. This effectively doubled the size of the colonies, now able to stretch west past the Proclamation Line to the Mississippi River. This land was organized into territories and then states, though there remained some conflict with the sea-to-sea grants claimed by some of the original colonies. In time, these grants were ceded to the federal government.

etc . . .

You Tube: Territorial History of the USA: Every Month for 400 Years.

You Tube: The History of the United States: Every Year.

Unequal Treatment before the Law

For an upcoming look at equal treament before the law.

Given the US's background as a British colony, what privileges were given to the elite?

Dear ChatGPT: In British history, what were the legal privileges of peers or nobility

In British history, peers—members of the nobility—had specific legal privileges that set them apart from commoners. These privileges were tied to their status in the peerage, the formal hierarchy of titles: Duke, Marquess, Earl, Viscount, and Baron (plus equivalents in Scotland and Ireland).

Here’s a breakdown of the legal privileges peers enjoyed historically:

1. Right to Sit in the House of Lords
- Until the House of Lords Act 1999, hereditary peers had the automatic right to sit in the House of Lords, the upper chamber of Parliament.
- Life peers (created after 1958) still retain this right.
- Gave them direct influence over legislation, governance, and the judicial system (since the Lords used to act as Britain’s highest court).

2. Trial by Peers
- If a peer was accused of treason or felony, they had the right to be tried in the House of Lords or by fellow peers.
- This was seen as protection against unfair trials by commoners.
- Example: In 1792, Lord George Gordon was tried for treason by his peers.
- Abolished in 1948.

3. Access to the Sovereign and Court
- Peers had personal access to the monarch and a right to attend court functions.
- Held ceremonial roles in coronations and state occasions.
- Some had hereditary offices (e.g., Earl Marshal, Lord Great Chamberlain).

4. Freedom from Arrest in Civil Cases
- Peers had limited immunity from arrest in civil cases (e.g., debt).
- This didn’t apply to criminal cases.
- Intended to prevent harassment or interruption of their parliamentary duties.
- Eventually became obsolete.

5. Exemption from Jury Service
- Peers were exempt from serving on juries.
- Partly because they were already expected to sit in judgment in the House of Lords (when it acted as a court of law).

6. Entitlement to Certain Honors and Precedence
- Peers ranked above all commoners in official order of precedence.
- They had the right to certain forms of address ("Your Grace," "My Lord") and heraldic privileges (coats of arms, coronets).
- Could only be judged as dishonorable by equals (a social and legal concept).

7. Control of Manorial Courts (Earlier Periods)
- In medieval and early modern times, many peers held manorial or feudal courts, where they exercised judicial authority over tenants.
- This faded with centralization of royal courts in the 17th century.


Dear ChatGPT: In British history, what was a gentleman? what special privileges did a gentleman have? 

In British history, a gentleman was a man of a certain social class and moral standing, typically someone who belonged to the landed gentry or upper middle class and who lived off income from land, investments, or a profession—rather than manual labor. The concept evolved over centuries, but there were consistent expectations tied to wealth, education, manners, and honor.

Origins and Evolution

- Medieval roots: Originally, a gentleman was someone who was entitled to bear arms but was not of noble rank (like a knight without a title). This made them part of the gentry, a class below the nobility but above commoners.

- Tudor and Stuart periods: The term became more formalized. Heralds and court officials regulated who could use the title, especially in relation to coats of arms.

- 18th–19th centuries: Being a gentleman came to include wealth, manners, and leisure. You could be a gentleman by birth, behavior, or profession (e.g. clergyman, barrister).

Privileges of a Gentleman

While not legal privileges like those of peers or nobility, gentlemen enjoyed social and practical advantages:

Social Respectability

- Held a higher place in society and were treated with deference by lower classes.
- Could participate in the "polite society"—social events, clubs, and gatherings that excluded tradesmen or laborers.

Education and Opportunity

- Had access to elite education (e.g. Oxford, Cambridge, public schools like Eton).
- More likely to secure positions in the church, military, law, and civil service.

Legal and Political Influence

- Could serve as justices of the peace, Members of Parliament, or local magistrates.
- Often held manorial rights over land and tenants.

Honor Culture

- Their word was taken seriously—honor and reputation mattered deeply.
- Could issue or accept duels to defend reputation (especially in the 18th century).

Freedom from Labor

- Gentlemen did not do manual work—doing so could strip someone of the title in a social sense.
- Income came from land, rents, investments, or salaried but "gentlemanly" professions.

Could You Become a Gentleman?

Yes, particularly by:
- Acquiring land or a coat of arms.
- Attending the right schools or entering a prestigious profession.
- Marrying into the right family.

But people who became rich through trade or industry were often looked down on—unless they adopted the manners and lifestyle of a gentleman.



Dear ChatGPT: What privileges did elites in Colonial America have?

Elites in colonial America—wealthy landowners, merchants, and high-ranking officials—enjoyed a wide range of privileges that set them apart from the majority of the population. Here’s a breakdown of their advantages:

1. Political Power
- Voting and Office-Holding: Property requirements limited political participation to wealthy men, so elites were usually the only ones who could vote or hold office.
- Control of Colonial Governments: Many elites were appointed to influential colonial councils, or elected to colonial assemblies where they shaped laws and policies.

2. Economic Control
- Land Ownership: Elites owned vast tracts of land, which was the main source of wealth and status, especially in Southern colonies.
- Slavery: Wealthy planters benefited from enslaved labor, especially in the South, where large plantations depended on enslaved Africans for agricultural work.
- Trade and Commerce: In the North, merchant elites controlled shipping, banking, and international trade routes, particularly in port cities like Boston and Philadelphia.

3. Social Prestige
- Education: Elite families could afford private tutors or send their children to Europe or colonial colleges (like Harvard or William & Mary).
- Leisure and Culture: They had time for arts, social clubs, fine dining, and other forms of high culture that poorer colonists couldn’t access.
- Marriage and Family Ties: Elites often intermarried to consolidate wealth and power, creating a small, tightly knit upper class.

4. Legal Advantages
- Preferential Treatment: Elite colonists often received lighter punishments in court or could influence judges and juries.
- Inheritance Laws: Primogeniture (especially in the South) allowed estates to be passed down intact to the eldest son, keeping wealth concentrated in elite families.

Would you like to dive deeper into a specific region, like New England vs. the South? The elite classes functioned quite differently depending on where you were.

From the New York Times 4/21/25

- White House Assesses Ways to Persuade Women to Have More Children.

Trump Raised $239 Million for Inauguration, More Than Doubling His Own Record.

Law Firms Made Deals With Trump. Now He Wants More From Them.

Trump Aides Close State Dept. Office on Foreign Disinformation.

Dear ChatGPT . . .

Hopefully this maes sense of 


Question #1: What is the history of the unitary executive theory?

The unitary executive theory is a constitutional theory about the scope of presidential power in the United States. It argues that the President has the power to control the entire executive branch absolutely, without interference from Congress or the courts in areas where the Constitution gives the executive authority.

Here's a breakdown of its history and evolution:

Founding Era (Late 18th Century)

The theory is rooted in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, which vests "the executive Power" in a single President.

Alexander Hamilton was an early proponent, especially in Federalist No. 70, where he argued for a strong, energetic executive.

The early debates centered on removal power—whether the President could remove executive officials without Senate approval. This issue was hotly contested in 1789 during the "Decision of 1789," which many later interpreters took as affirming presidential control over executive officers.

19th Century

Practice was mixed. Some presidents (like Andrew Jackson) asserted strong executive control, while others deferred more to Congress.

The Tenure of Office Act (1867), passed over President Andrew Johnson’s veto, tried to limit presidential removal power, leading to Johnson’s impeachment—this highlighted tensions over executive control.

The Supreme Court was mostly quiet on the theory, but the seeds were planted for later disputes.

20th Century

In Myers v. United States (1926), the Supreme Court sided with a strong view of presidential removal power, invalidating a law requiring Senate approval to remove a postmaster.

But in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935), the Court limited that power, distinguishing between purely executive officers and those in independent regulatory commissions (like the FTC).

The New Deal era saw Congress create many independent agencies, weakening the idea of a single, unitary executive.

Still, presidents like FDR and Reagan supported more centralized control over the executive branch.

Modern Developments (1980s–Present)

The theory gained prominence during the Reagan administration, when legal scholars like Steven Calabresi and Christopher Yoo gave it intellectual heft.

It became a centerpiece of conservative constitutional theory, especially through the Federalist Society.

In Morrison v. Olson (1988), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of independent counsels, rejecting a strong unitary executive view. Justice Scalia’s lone dissent, however, became a landmark defense of the theory.

The theory resurfaced in:

George W. Bush’s administration, particularly in signing statements and national security matters post-9/11.

The Trump administration, which openly embraced broad executive powers, especially regarding the DOJ and removal of officials.

Recent Supreme Court Cases

Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB (2010): Court struck down dual layers of for-cause removal protections, bolstering the unitary executive theory.

Seila Law v. CFPB (2020): Invalidated restrictions on removing the CFPB director, affirming the President’s removal power over single-headed agencies.

Collins v. Yellen (2021): Reaffirmed the Seila Law ruling, continuing the trend toward a stronger executive.

Summary of Key Ideas

Strong View: President must have full control over executive officials, including firing them at will.

Moderate View: Some independence for agencies is okay, especially for quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial functions.

Weak View: The President's control can be limited by Congress creating independent agencies.

Question #2: 

Does the president have full control over all executive decisions?

The short answer is: not exactly. While the President is the head of the executive branch and has a lot of power, there are constitutional, legal, and practical limits to that control.

Let’s break it down:

What the President can control:

Top-level executive officers: The President appoints (with Senate approval) and can often remove Cabinet secretaries and agency heads.

Executive orders and directives: The President can issue orders to federal agencies to implement policies (as long as they don’t violate existing law).

Military and foreign policy: As Commander-in-Chief, the President has wide discretion over military operations and diplomacy.

Prosecution priorities: Through the Attorney General and DOJ, the President can set enforcement priorities (though not specific cases).

What the President can’t fully control:

1. Independent agencies

Agencies like the Federal Reserve, FTC, or SEC have leaders who are often protected from at-will removal.

Their independence is meant to insulate them from political pressure.

Courts have sometimes upheld these protections (e.g., Humphrey’s Executor), though this is evolving (see Seila Law and Collins v. Yellen).

2. Civil service protections

Most federal employees are career civil servants, not political appointees.

They’re protected from firing without cause, which limits the President’s control over lower-level decisions.

3. Congressional statutes

Congress can delegate authority to agencies and limit how that power is used.

The President can’t override these laws unless they’re ruled unconstitutional or changed by Congress.

4. Judicial review

Courts can strike down executive actions that violate the Constitution or federal law.

Example: Trump’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the census was blocked by the Supreme Court (Dept. of Commerce v. New York).

5. Budgetary controls

Congress holds the power of the purse, so the President can't fund programs without congressional approval.

What it really comes down to:

The unitary executive theory argues for strong presidential control, but even under that view, the President's power is not unlimited. In practice, it’s a balancing act between:

The Constitution’s grant of executive power,

Congress’s ability to structure the bureaucracy, and

The courts’ interpretation of those powers and limits.

Friday, April 18, 2025

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Questions presented before the Supreme Court

- OK Charter School Board v. Drummond.

This Court has "repeatedly held that a State violates the Free Exercise Clause when it excludes religious observers from otherwise available public benefits." Carson as next friend of O. C. v. Makin, 596 U.S. 767, 778 (2022). Three times, the Court has applied that principle to strike down "state efforts to withhold otherwise available public benefits from religious organizations." Id. at 778-79 (citing Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, 582 U.S. 449 (2017); Espinoza v. Mont. Dep't of Revenue, 591 U.S. 464 (2020)).

Contrary to those precedents, the Oklahoma Supreme Court held that a state can exclude privately owned and operated religious charter schools from its charter-school program by enforcing state-law bans on "sectarian" and religiously affiliated charter schools. The court also held that a charter school engages in state action for constitutional purposes when it contracts with the state to provide publicly funded education. These rulings implicate an entrenched circuit split and present two questions for review:

1. Whether the academic and pedagogical choices of a privately owned and run school constitute state action simply because it contracts with the state to offer a free educational option for interested students.

2. Whether a state violates the Free Exercise Clause by excluding privately run religious schools from the state's charter-school program solely because the schools are religious, or whether a state can justify such an exclusion by invoking anti-establishment interests that go further than the Establishment Clause requires. 


- St. Isidore of Seville Sch. v. Drummond.

This Court has repeatedly held that the Free Exercise Clause prohibits a state from denying generally available benefits to a school solely because it is religious. That principle should have resolved this case. Petitioner is a private religious institution. It seeks to partake in the benefits of Oklahoma's charter school program. But the court below invalidated Petitioner's contract with the charter school board. The court disregarded this Court's Free Exercise precedents because, in its view, Petitioner had become an arm of the government by virtue of that contract. It thus held that the Establishment Clause and Oklahoma laws aimed at creating "a complete separation of church and state" compelled the court to deny Petitioner-on religious grounds-the benefits created by Oklahoma's Charter Schools Act.

The questions presented are:

1. Whether the academic and pedagogical choices of a privately owned and run school constitute state action simply because it contracts with the state to offer a free educational option for interested students.

2. Whether a state violates the Free Exercise Clause by excluding privately run religious schools from the state's charter school program solely because the schools are religious, or whether a state can justify such an exclusion by invoking anti-establishment interests that go further than the Establishment Clause requires. 

Dear ChatGPT: What is a Gulag?

Commentators are using the term "gulag" to refer to the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador. 

I don't if this is an approporiate use of the term, or if it is, but what does it refer to?

Here's what ChatGPT tells me: 

A gulag was a system of forced labor camps established and run by the Soviet Union, particularly under Joseph Stalin in the mid-20th century. The word "GULAG" is actually an acronym for "Glavnoe Upravlenie Lagerei" (Главное управление лагерей), which translates to "Main Camp Administration."

Here’s a quick breakdown:

- Purpose: They were used to imprison political dissidents, criminals, intellectuals, or even ordinary citizens accused of minor offenses. Many people ended up there after unfair trials or no trial at all.

- Conditions: Harsh. Prisoners faced extreme cold, hard labor, malnutrition, abuse, and high mortality rates.

- Labor: Prisoners worked in mining, logging, construction, or factory work—often in remote, brutal areas like Siberia.

- Scale: Millions were imprisoned in the gulag system, especially from the 1930s through the 1950s.

The gulags are now widely viewed as a symbol of totalitarian repression and are often referenced in discussions about human rights abuses.
|

Another question: How many gulags did the Soviets operate?

The exact number of gulags varied over time, but here’s a solid breakdown:

Estimated Number of Gulag Camps

- The Soviet Union operated hundreds of individual camp complexes, with thousands of sub-camps spread across the country.

- At its peak in the early 1950s, there were about 476 main camp complexes.

- Within those, there were thousands of smaller camp units or outposts—some estimates put the total number of camp locations at over 30,000 throughout the entire gulag system.

How many people were imprisoned?

- From 1929 to 1953, it's estimated that 18 million people passed through the gulag system.

- Of those, around 1.5 to 2 million people died due to starvation, overwork, harsh weather, and execution.

The system wasn't just about incarceration—it was designed to extract labor from prisoners under extreme conditions, often in remote, resource-rich areas like Siberia, Kazakhstan, and the Arctic.

Catching up on Trump's Attacks on the Judiciary

- In Showdowns With the Courts, Trump Is Increasingly Combative.

The Trump administration’s compliance with court orders started with foot-dragging, moved to semantic gymnastics and has now arrived at the cusp of outright defiance.

Large swaths of President Trump’s agenda have been tied up in court, challenged in scores of lawsuits. The administration has frozen money that the courts have ordered it to spend. It has blocked The Associated Press from the White House press pool despite a court order saying that the news organization be allowed to participate. And it ignored a judge’s instruction to return planes carrying Venezuelan immigrants bound for a notorious prison in El Salvador.

But Exhibit A in what legal scholars say is a deeply worrisome and escalating trend is the administration’s combative response to the Supreme Court’s ruling last week in the case of a Salvadoran immigrant. The administration deported the immigrant, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, to El Salvador despite a 2019 ruling from an immigration judge specifically and directly prohibiting that very thing. . . .


The Constitutional Crisis Is Here.

. . . This rhetorical game the administration is playing, where it pretends it lacks the power to ask for Abrego Garcia to be returned while Bukele pretends he doesn’t have the power to return him, is an expression of obvious contempt for the Supreme Court—and for the rule of law. The administration is maintaining that it has the power to send armed agents of the state to grab someone off the street and then, without a shred of due process, deport them to a Gulag in a foreign country and leave them there forever. The crucial point here is that the administration’s logic means that it could do the same to American citizens—after all, if deporting someone under a protective order to a Gulag without so much as a hearing is a “foreign policy” matter with which no court may interfere, then the citizenship of the condemned person doesn’t matter.

Trump is already contemplating the possibility of deporting citizens. Aside from numerous public statements to that effect, Trump told Bukele, in an exchange posted on Bukele’s X feed, “Homegrowns are next. The homegrowns. You gotta build about five more places.” Loud laughter filled the Oval Office.

Catching up on Trump's Attacks on Private Higher Education

- Inside Trump’s Pressure Campaign on Universities.

Trump May Seek Judicial Oversight of Columbia, Potentially for Years.

- What to Know as Trump Freezes Federal Funds for Harvard and Other Universities.

- Why Harvard Decided to Fight Trump.

- Read the Trump Administration’s Letter to Harvard.

- Trump Administration Will Freeze $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses Demands.

Monday, April 14, 2025

https://www.transparencyusa.org/tx/contributor/steven-alvis?cycle=2015-to-now&page=1

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/columnists/sarnoff/article/Developer-builds-family-camp-for-the-6854872.php

https://www.houstonoaks.com/story/owners

https://younginvincibles.org/our-story/

https://www.txdot.gov/about/leadership/texas-transportation-commission/steven-alvis.html

https://www.alvin-tx.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2296/Campaign-Finance-Report-2025-Seth-Carrasco?bidId=

https://texasblockchaincouncil.org/

https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=89R&Bill=SB365

Accessing Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services

Recent Developments in Texas Property Taxes, Especially School Taxes

 










Sunday, April 13, 2025

Education--Bilingual

Education--County Administration

Education--Driver Education & Training

Education--General

Education--Higher--Admission & Attendance

Education--Higher--Athletics

Education--Higher--Faculty

Education--Higher--Finance

Education--Higher--General

Education--Higher--Health Institutions

Education--Higher--Institutions & Programs

Education--Higher--Private Schools

Education--Higher--State Coordination

Education--Higher--Student Fees

Education--Higher--Student Financial Aid

Education--Higher--Textbooks

Education--Higher--Tuition

Education--Junior College Districts

Education--Nonpublic Schools--Vocational/Avocational

Education--Primary & Secondary--Accountability

Education--Primary & Secondary--Admission & Attendance

Education--Primary & Secondary--Charter Schools

Education--Primary & Secondary--Curriculum

Education--Primary & Secondary--Discipline

Education--Primary & Secondary--Extracurricular Activities

Education--Primary & Secondary--Facilities

Education--Primary & Secondary--Finance

Education--Primary & Secondary--General

Education--Primary & Secondary--Home Schooling

Education--Primary & Secondary--Other School Personnel

Education--Primary & Secondary--Private

Education--Primary & Secondary--Special

Education--Primary & Secondary--Teachers

Education--Primary & Secondary--Testing

Education--Primary & Secondary--Textbooks

Education--Primary & Secondary--Virtual Education

Education--Primary & Secondary--Vocational

Education--Rural

Education--School Districts

For GOVT 2306: Article 3 of the Texas Constitution

- 1876.

- Current.

Water desalination in El Paso, Texas

Desalination as a Source of Fresh Water: Brackish Groundwater Desalinati...

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act

H.R.22 - SAVE Act.

- Wikipedia: The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act.

- Analysis.

- Campaign Legal Center: What You Need to Know About the SAVE Act.

- Bipartisan Policy Center: Five Things to Know About the SAVE Act.

Some info for the May 3rd Local Elections

From the Brazoria County Clerk: 

- Current Election Information.

- Precinct Maps.

- Sample Ballots.

- City of Alvin: May 3, 2025 General Election.

- Alvin ISD: Trustee Election 2025.

- City of Pearland: 2025 GENERAL ELECTION.

- Pearland ISD: Election Information.