Wednesday, April 6, 2016

From the Texas Tribune: Rick Perry's Criminal Case Officially Dismissed

It would be worth analyzing patterns in what types of cases they dismiss and what types of cases they don't. Does it matter who is accused?

- Click here for the article.

The criminal case against former Gov.Rick Perry was officially dismissed on Wednesday, weeks after Texas' highest criminal court ordered that it be dropped.

Judge Bert Richardson, who presided over the case in Travis County and now serves on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, signed an order dismissing the abuse of power indictment related to a 2013 veto threat.

The case against the longest-serving governor in Texas history centered on a threat to veto $7.5 million in state funds for the public integrity unit of the Travis County district attorney's office, and questions about whether he abused his authority — allegations that he had called a "baseless political attack." The unit was charged with investigating and prosecuting state corruption.

After Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg was arrested and pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated in 2013, Perry threatened to veto state funding for the integrity unit unless she first resigned. She refused to step down, and Perry vetoed the funding.
 
Perry and his lawyers successfully argued that he was acting within the powers of a governor and did nothing criminal.
. . . Michael McCrum, the special prosecutor in the case, said he still believed that Perry committed a crime — and had drafted and printed copies of a motion for an amended indictment. But on Tuesday afternoon, he decided to halt the effort, saying the high court's ruling had "muddied" the criminal statute at issue.
“It was our position, and our feeling that the law had been so muddied that it was not the just thing to do with any citizen," he said.

From Ballotpedia: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

No comments:

Post a Comment