Sunday, April 10, 2016

From the NYT: The Voter Support Agency Accused of Suppressing Votes

In 2306 - mostly - we discussed the impact that the U.S. Election Assistance Commission is meant to have on improving how elections are run in the state. The agency's new director has made decisions some argue are intended to make it easier for states to engage in voter suppression.

- Click here for the article.

The federal Election Assistance Commission was formed after the disputed 2000 election between George W. Bush and Al Gore and given an innocuous name and a seemingly inoffensive mission: to help state election officials make it easier to vote.
In this ideologically riven election season, it turns out, that is not easy at all.
The election commission is in federal court this month, essentially accused of trying to suppress voter turnout in this November’s election. The Justice Department, its nominal legal counsel, has declined to defend it. Its case instead is being pleaded by one of the nation’s leading advocates of voting restrictions. The agency’s chairman has disavowed its actions.
The quarrel exemplifies how the mere act of voting has become enmeshed in volatile partisan politics. Seventeen states will impose new voting restrictions for November’s presidential election. Many are the object of disputes between those who say they are rooting out voter fraud and those who say the real goal is to keep Democratic-leaning voters from casting ballots.
The lawsuit’s origin is straightforward. The agency’s executive director, Brian D. Newby, had been in his job less than three months in January when he unilaterally reversed a policy that the body’s commissioners, two Democrats and two Republicans, had endorsed since the agency’s creation in 2002: that people registering to vote need offer no proof, beyond swearing an oath, that they are American citizens.
That decision gave Kansas, Georgia and Alabama officials a blessing to alter the federal voter registration applications handed out in motor vehicle offices and many other state agencies, replacing the oath with something stiffer: a demand for proof of citizenship, such as a birth certificate.
There was but one problem, critics say: Mr. Newby had no authority to make policy, a power reserved for the agency’s four commissioners.

Here are links related to items contained n the story.

- Wikipedia: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
- Wikipedia: Help America Vote Act.
- CRS: The Help America Vote Act and Election Administration: Overview and Issues.
- Oyez: Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona.
- NYT: Justices Block Law Requiring Voters to Prove Citizenship.
- NYT: The Court: Congress Regulates Federal Elections.

No comments:

Post a Comment