Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Will the decline in the number of people working in the media create problems for the viability of democracy in the US?

The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press have released their latest analysis of the state of the media in the US: The State of the News Media 2013. Perhaps the simplest message it is sending is that declining revenue has lead news providers to layoff reporters and editors and has allowed public and private agencies - news makers - to take their messages directly to the public. This allows them to by-pass the critical filter that the news media generally provides.

Increasingly the news we receive is formulated by those normally covered by the news. They have a greater ability to shape how we think about news events. Public relations professional now have more influence than reporters, which negates the traditional role that the media is meant to play in a democracy. Instead of making evaluations of public matters based on objective information, the information we receive will be purposely biased in favor of the interests sending the information out.

From the report's overview:


. . . so far, this trend has emerged most clearly in the political sphere, particularly with the biggest story of 2012—the presidential election. A Pew Research Center analysis revealed that campaign reporters were acting primarily as megaphones, rather than as investigators, of the assertions put forward by the candidates and other political partisans. That meant more direct relaying of assertions made by the campaigns and less reporting by journalists to interpret and contextualize them. This is summarized in our special video report on our Election Research, only about a quarter of statements in the media about the character and records of the presidential candidates originated with journalists in the 2012 race, while twice that many came from political partisans. That is a reversal from a dozen years earlier when half the statements originated with journalists and a third came from partisans. The campaigns also found more ways than ever to connect directly with citizens.

There are signs of this trend that carry beyond the political realm, as more and more entities seek, by various means, to fill the void left by overstretched editorial resources. Business leaders in Detroit, MI, for example, have created an organization to serve as a kind of tour guide to journalists with the goal of injecting more favorable portrayals of the city into media coverage. The government of Malaysia was recently discovered to have bankrolled propaganda that appeared in several major U.S. outlets under columnists’ bylines. A number of news organizations, including The Associated Press, recently carried a fake press release about Google that came from a PR distribution site that promises clients it will reach “top media outlets.” And recently, journalist David Cay Johnston in writing about a pitch from one corporate marketer that included a “vacation reward” for running his stories, remarked, “Journalists get lots of pitches like this these days, which is partly a reflection of how the number of journalists has shriveled while the number of publicists has grown.” Indeed, an analysis of Census Bureau data by Robert McChesney and John Nichols found the ratio of public relations workers to journalists grew from 1.2 to 1 in 1980 to 3.6 to 1 in 2008—and the gap has likely only widened since.